 |
 |
|
I strongly believe the current unrest in Israel is the prefect setup for an the antichrist to come in the rescue the situation. In the past decade dozens of world leaders have all failed to end the fighting. It seems the stage is now set for the Beast to come and work his magic. -- Raptureready.com |
|
 |  |
News: Up From Liberalism: William F. Buckley Jr.
Posted on Thursday, February 28 @ 07:38:39 PST by Virgil |
|
Conservatively speaking, the life of William F. Buckley Jr. seems wildly improbable. One man is rarely granted his range of gifts: He was at once an essayist, editor, impresario, controversialist, critic, novelist, sportsman and bon vivant. He was the captain of a publication that, as he once famously put it, stood "athwart History, yelling Stop," yet he personally lived in relentless forward motion. When liberalism was dominant but hidebound in the second half of the last century, he pioneered a new direction that transformed American politics.
William Francis Buckley Jr. died Wednesday morning in Stamford, Connecticut, at age 82. Appropriately enough, he was working on a column. His death is the severing of the last remaining link between contemporary American conservatism and its founding generation.
In 1950, the literary critic Lionel Trilling could assert "the plain fact" that there were no conservative ideas "in general circulation." That confidence would be ground away. In 1951, Bill Buckley made his name with "God and Man at Yale," which critiqued his alma mater for its hostilities to capitalism and religion. Four years later, Buckley founded National Review. He was 29.
In its fecund early period in the 1950s and '60s, National Review helped introduce a modern conservatism into American political life. Buckley and his talented stable of editors and contributors gave coherence and shape to what he called "a fusion" of traditionalism, anti-Communist internationalism and free-market economics. Equally important, the magazine worked to discredit fringe elements like the John Birchers, the Jew-haters and the Lindbergh isolationists.
This coalition served as the intellectual foundation for the rising architecture of the conservative movement. In 1964, Barry Goldwater defeated the Eastern establishment's Nelson Rockefeller for the Republican Presidential nomination. Though Goldwater badly lost, the ideas that animated his candidacy continued to gain support, and the 1980s saw the Presidency of Ronald Reagan and its fruits, a revolution in domestic economic policy and the undoing of the Soviet empire.
These achievements might not have happened without Buckley, who was uniquely suited to preside over the often-feuding factions of the early political right. He liked arguments over principle, but he also had an uncommon talent for adjudicating disputes and building coalitions. And though Buckley had bedrock beliefs, he had a conservative's distrust for systems and grand theories; his politics were pragmatic. His thinking and prose were governed by a critical-deliberative style that emphasized contingency and complexity. More than anything else, Buckley wanted to promulgate what he often referred to as "a thoughtful conservatism."
Click here to read the entire article
|
| |
 |
|
Average Score: 5 Votes: 1
|
|
 |
^^Go to Top - E-mail to Friend - Print - View PDF - Subscribe - Comments RSS
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
Re: Up From Liberalism: William F. Buckley Jr. (Score: 1)
by rfwitt (hifive@att.net) on Thursday, February 28 @ 14:38:24 PST (User Info | Send a Message) | In the tribute to William Buckley in the N.R. mag there is this quote:
"When Buckley wrote that the magazine would “stand athwart history yelling, ‘Stop!’” his point was to challenge the idea that history pointed left."
From where I sit (regarding this country)I'd say history in America is still pointed left. The Republican party has accepted the inevitability of big government. The Bush administration was "socialism lite". It looks to me that the next election will push us further in that direction.
Richard... |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by MiddleKnowledge on Thursday, February 28 @ 15:28:01 PST
- by Ed on Thursday, February 28 @ 16:14:29 PST
- by Virgil on Thursday, February 28 @ 16:17:13 PST
- by Ed on Thursday, February 28 @ 17:12:24 PST
- by Virgil on Thursday, February 28 @ 18:27:44 PST
- by Ed on Thursday, February 28 @ 20:11:01 PST
- by tom-g on Saturday, March 01 @ 08:22:57 PST
- by Ed on Saturday, March 01 @ 14:04:22 PST
- by tom-g on Saturday, March 01 @ 15:44:48 PST
- by tom-g on Saturday, March 01 @ 15:49:31 PST
- by MiddleKnowledge on Thursday, February 28 @ 16:38:32 PST
Re: Up From Liberalism: William F. Buckley Jr. (Score: 1)
by tom-g on Friday, February 29 @ 06:09:55 PST (User Info | Send a Message) | It seems that up to this point the comments have been an in-house debate between libertarians.
Somehow it seems, Buckley's Hegelian Dialectic, has been completely ignored. The "thesis" of traditional American political theory was merged with its "antithesis" of anti communist internationalism and free market economics and the result was Buckley's "synthesis" that transformed traditional American politics into its contradiction, "modern conservatism in American politics."
It is interesting that Ed would choose Ayn Rand as the philosopher to express true libertarianism, if there was anyone who hated Christianity and our traditional American system more than Rand, I don't know who it would be.
God said it. Rand hated it. Therefore for Randians, that settles it, God was wrong.
Tom |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by Ed on Saturday, March 01 @ 07:13:20 PST
- by Ed on Saturday, March 01 @ 07:15:21 PST
- by tom-g on Saturday, March 01 @ 16:17:44 PST
- by EWMI on Sunday, March 02 @ 00:13:54 PST
- by tom-g on Sunday, March 02 @ 10:14:41 PST
Re: Up From Liberalism: William F. Buckley Jr. (Score: 1)
by Starlight on Friday, February 29 @ 14:34:09 PST (User Info | Send a Message) | I just wanted to add my two cents worth to the comments about Buckley. He influenced me significantly as I came of age. I remember when I discovered Firing Line that it was one of those few shows on Saturday's that could actually pull me away from my first love, Football. I learned to appreciate intellectual discussions and I still do and find it such a pleasure when people can interact with civility as Buckley required on his shows.
I’ll leave to the critics the discussion of his influence and importance in the conservative movement. I did find David Brooks whom I can relate to in temperament writing about Buckley today in the NY Times. Brooks was a protégé of Buckley and here is some musings from his piece.
Brooks quote:
“Days at the magazine were filled with rituals. And through all the fun, I don’t recall him talking about politics much. HE TALKED ABOUT LITERATURE, HISTORY, THEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY AND THE CHARMS OF THE PECULIAR PEOPLE HE HAD KNOWN. I don’t recall politicians at his home, but I do recall literary critics like Anatole Broyard and social thinkers like James Burnham, even after his stroke.
Buckley contained all the intellectual tensions of conservatism, the pessimism of Albert Jay Nock and Whittaker Chambers, as well as the optimism of Ronald Reagan. HE LOVED LIBERTY AND FELT IT MUST BE CONSTRAINED BY THE INVISIBLE BONDS OF THE TRANSCENDENT ORDER.
One night we were at his home, and his wife, Pat, at the height of her glamour, swept in from an evening on the town and took one look at the little group of us debating some point. You could feel her inner thought: “WHY DOES HE SPEND HIS TIME WITH THOSE PEOPLE?” BUT BUCKLEY LOVED IDEAS, swept us along as his companions, and sent us out into the world.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/29/opinion/29brooks.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
I think many of us here at Planet Preterist can relate to spending time “with those people” searching new ideas with others. Buckley invited that quality of inquisitiveness that those who are curious and want to know could always feel a kindred spirit with and usually didn’t come away empty.
Norm Voss
|
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by Virgil on Friday, February 29 @ 19:27:39 PST
- by Starlight on Friday, February 29 @ 20:20:11 PST
- by tom-g on Saturday, March 01 @ 04:34:00 PST
|
|