 |
 |
|
I place a curse on every man and every woman that will stretch his hand against this anointing. I curse that man who dares to speak a word against this ministry. -- Benny Hinn, Praise The Lord, Trinity Broadcasting Network, September 10, 1999 |
|
 |  |
News: Re: Jesus, Hades and Mythology
Posted on Friday, April 27 @ 06:24:24 PDT by Ostraloa |
|
This is a response to the conclusions made Jeremy Lile in his post: Jesus, Hades & Mythology: with an Addendum Concerning Eternal Conscious Torment and Preterism. (Article was also recently posted as a comment under Jesus, Hades and Mythology)
In a way this an article in defense of the conclusions and article by Ed Stevens on the “conscious eternal” afterlife of the just and unjust. First of all, I am a old friend and acquaintance of Ed Stevens. After moving to Brazil with my family, I lost my constant contact with him as I had previously held. I also began to differ with him in the “minor’s” such as his “Literal Rapture” of the 1st century saints viewpoint. He will always however remain a friend close at heart regardless of our physical distance and minor differences. This time I am writing in his defense in sorts at the same time a rebuttal to the article posted by Jeremy Lile as titled above. It will be a brief account staking out the biblical position regarding eternal conscious punishment of the reprobate and it’s corresponding subject of “Hell” and it’s biblical and extra-biblical citations.
To proceed, my first response after reading this article by Jeremy was, good article with depth of research and timeliness of the subject matter. In afterthought though, it falls short of the bottom of the subject. I will first start out by stating that I have posted on this wrote on the subject of the inner earth to many preterists without response. After thinking over the reasons why I was given virtually no response I was left clueless. The best excuse was made by one well known preterist writer and contributor to this site, “well I haven’t thought of that”. Well, it’s time preterists deal seriously with what really is in the inner earth and about the subject of hell. As preterist Christians it will only aid in our consistency when being addressed by futurists we witness to.
Some important topical definitions:
Hell - The English word for the final place of punishment for the reprobate.
Tarturus - Greek meaning the Abyss, Deep place. The place of eternal punishment for fallen angels and reprobate souls.
Hades - Greek meaning the Unseen realm. Pre- A.D. 70 two receptacles:
1. Abraham’s bosom - resting place of departed righteous awaiting the anastasis (rising) in A.D. 70.
2. Place of torment – place where reprobate awaited judgment of A.D. 70.
Sheol - *Two words used in most English trans. in O.T. for sheol:
1. Hebrew equivalent of Gk, (Hades)
2. Hebrew equivalent of Gk. (Grave) i.e. Topos
Abrahams’ bosom - Hebrew common phrase resting place of righteous departed prior to A.D. 70.
I will begin my rebuttal of the conclusions by Jeremy’s posting with the following:
Eph. 4:9-10 is an excellent place to begin. Jeremy quotes this verse, yet does not explain neither elaborate just where Jesus was during his three days and three nights in the “kardia” heart of the earth. Was Jesus conscious there? What did He do there? Just where are the lower parts of the earth? Did it have different compartments? The following verses will help us answer these questions.
1 Pet. 3:18-20, Were the spirits of verse 19 “dis-enbodied” there or em-bodied? Who did he preach to unconscious dis-embodied spirits? Was this verse referring this the earthly ministry or Jesus’ ministry to a department of Sheol. Yes, I will also show Sheol had departments shortly as well. This verse follows verse 18 which had just stated that Jesus was quickened after death by the Spirit; By which also he went and preached to the spirits in prison. These two verses are a continuation thought of Peter’s showing Jesus went during the three days and three nights and preached to the captive souls in Sheol/Hades or Abraham’s bosom.
Where was this Hades of the Greeks or Sheol to the Hebrews? Three key verses can help.
Math. 12:40
‘..so shall the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the “kardia” Gk. heart of the earth’.
- Is not the heart our deepest part physically. So in this case, Jesus went into the deepest part of the earth. i.e. “not just the crust” or the so–called mantle if you believe what the scientists are telling the truth about what’s under our feet but, the actual center of the earth. More on the implications of this later.
Lk. 23:43
“And Jesus said unto him, Verily, I say unto thee today shalt thou be with me in paradise”.
Jeremy in his article addresses a reply on this verse, but still seems unsure on this one. Where was this paradise? Where there people there? Is this not Abraham’s bosom being mentioned? If so, where are the reprobate pre-A.D. 70 people? We shall see so in due time.
Phil. 2:10 Gives the answer where.
‘that every knee should bow in heaven, in earth and under the earth’
- The Gk. word for earth “katachthonios” is used only one time in the entire N.T. meaning not under the earth, but literally, in the sub-terranean realms or heart “middle” of the earth.
please review also: 1 Sam. 28, on the account of Saul the woman of Endor and Samuel.
Lk. 16 Parable of Lazarus & the Rich man (not a parable in reality).
The so-called Parable of Lazarus & the Rich Man has been quoted by many futurists denying the truths in story Jesus makes. Does the fact Jesus illustrated different departments of Hades or Sheol in this story prove He borrowed Greek terminology, or did not have literal truths behind the symbols? Absolutely not.
Jesus did not have to borrow the Greek words or concepts due to being present in a Hellenistic culture contrary to the positions of Jeremy in his post. He was a Israelite was addressing the lost sheep of the house of Israel. He used the word Hades to describe Abraham’s bosom more clearly for all his audience. He used gehenna to address the future of eternal conscious punishment for the reprobate, not necessarily using this term because the fact that trash burned up there and disappears. The important issue he was illustrating in this term was the fact that the fires and the trash burned there continually in the ‘Valley of Hinnom’. Gehenna was therefore, a parabolic term for future eternal conscious punishment of the wicked.
Now the “Townley Error” as I’ll term it for lack of a better term. I will define it as such: It says, that since all was accomplished in A.D. 70 regarding future punishment then, eternal punishment has ceased due to it’s covenantal application limitation. This error falls short of the universal application of what God had in scope in the A.D. 70 regeneration and what was accomplished as stressed in recent articles by Kurt Simmons. Robert Townley wrote a excellent book in 1845 as the first full preterist book, but he later fell in error over this unbiblical position. Often such error is caused by not going to the bottom of a subject which is what happened in his views concerning this area of eschatology.
Since Jeremy was willing to bring up the Book of Enoch in his post, I will expand on it’s relevance to our subject and some more about the books origins and why it ultimately was left out of the Biblical canon of the Western world. To the ancient Abyssinian Church uninfluenced by the east or west, the book remained canonical since apostolic times.
According to sources, the Book of Enoch was rediscovered by James Bruce in 1773 in present day Ethiopia and was more or less left untranslated until Richard Laurence made his translations into English 1821, the last being the 1838 (3rd edition) from the Bodleian manuscript being one of the three brought back by Bruce from Ethiopia. Richard Laurence when translating the Book of Enoch deemed it to be of recent extra-biblical origins or pseudopigraphical. This was due to his opinion of the book not being the actually the words or written by the ante-diluvian patriarch Enoch. His view now maintained in the West, was that it was of “later Jewish origins” not authored before 200 B.C. The reasons being that the prophecies in Enoch contained reference to Herod and the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 being the time of final judgment. The true author in his view, then had to live in a time after or slightly before it’s later prophecies. This is typical higher criticism which was fashionable at the time. I would ask, where’s the inspiration factor Mr. Laurence!! The world must be grateful to antiquarians like Richard Laurence for their work, but to take their opinions as final decisions on the validity and originality of a text or subject can be a big mistake.
The facts are the Book of Enoch was purposely deleted out of the Hebrew canon in A.D. 90 by the reconvened Sanhedrin Council of Yavne called by Yohannan ben Zakkai and Simon ben Gamaliel II due to it’s references to the Son of Man, the Elect One and the Messiah as Enoch describes Jesus Christ whom their immediate elders had crucified. This means that with certainty the Pella community of Christians would have upheld Enoch's canonicity led by Simon and his faithful band of followers which had left Jerusalem most likely in A.D. 66 after Cestius Gallus had left off his own siege of Jerusalem. Christians later quoted and upheld the Book of Enoch’s authority if not it’s canonicity.
Among the early Christians, Tertullian circa A.D. 200 is quoted from a work as bluntly stating that the “Jews have taken the Book of Enoch out of Hebrew canon due to it’s prophecies concerning Christ”. Later opposition among some Christians led by Jerome and Hilary influenced others at the Council of Laodicea A.D. 364 to once and for all dispose of the spurious Book of Enoch. Possibly, in addition to following the Rabbis advice and cover up, they felt threatened as futurists by Enoch’s 70 generation limitation of the final judgment being A.D. 70!
I am not writing to prove the canonicity of Enoch that’s another subject, but it has to be reviewed carefully in light of it’s contents regarding the Hebraic concept of Sheol or Hades. I will show from the Book of Enoch quoted by Jude, that there is eternal conscious punishment for the unjust as well as having different receptacles of both the just and unjust prior to A.D. 70.
I now quote Richard Laurence translation of:
Enoch chapter 22 in full:
“1. From there I proceeded to another spot, where I saw on the west a great and lofty mountain, a strong rock, and four delightful places.
2. Internally it was deep, capacious, and very smooth; as smooth as if it had been rolled over: it was both deep and dark to behold.
3. Then Raphael, one of the holy angels who were with me, answered and said, These are the delightful places where the spirits, the souls of the dead, will be collected; for them were they formed; and here will be collected all the souls of the sons of men.
4. These places, in which they dwell, shall they occupy until the day of judgment, and until their appointed period.
5. Their appointed period will be long, even until the great judgment. And I saw the spirits of the sons of men who were dead; and their voices reached to heaven, while they were accusing.
6. Then I inquired of Raphael, an angel who was with me, and said, Whose spirit is that, the voice of which reaches to heaven, and accuses?
7. He answered, saying, This is the spirit of Abel who was slain by Cain his brother; and who will accuse that brother, until his seed be destroyed from the face of the earth;
8. Until his seed perish from the seed of the human race.
9. At that time therefore I inquired respecting him, and respecting the general judgment, saying, Why is one separated from another? He answered, Three separations have been made between the spirits of the dead, and thus have the spirits of the righteous been separated.
10. Namely, by a chasm, by water, and by light above it.
11. And in the same way likewise are sinners separated when they die, and are buried in the earth; judgment not overtaking them in their lifetime.
12. Here their souls are separated. Moreover, abundant is their suffering until the time of the great judgment, the castigation, and the torment of those who eternally execrate, whose souls are punished and bound there for ever.
13. And thus has it been from the beginning of the world. Thus has there existed a separation between the souls of those who utter complaints, and of those who watch for their destruction, to slaughter them in the day of sinners.
14. A receptacle of this sort has been formed for the souls of unrighteous men, and of sinners; of those who have completed crime, and associated with the impious, whom they resemble. Their souls shall not be annihilated in the day of judgment, neither shall they arise from this place. Then I blessed God,
15. And said, Blessed by my Lord, the Lord of glory and of righteousness, who reigns over all for ever and for ever.
This passage from Enoch shows clearly the following points:
1. All embodied souls went to Sheol/Hades prior to A.D. 70. (not the grave either)!
2. There were separate compartments in Sheol/Hades prior to A.D. 70.
3. They were conscious there and had remembrance.
4. Post-A.D. 70, the impious unjust remain there conscious with eternal punishment and are not anniallated or raised from there.
5. The just were raised A.D. 70 from their compartment i.e. Lazarus bosom, or Paradise into Heaven itself.
Josephus’ Discourse to Greeks on Hades proves interesting for further proof as follows in brief:
"Now as to Hades, wherein the souls of the righteous and unrighteous are detained, it is necessary to speak of it. Hades is a place in the world not regularly finished; a subterraneous region, where the light of this world does not shine . . . This region is allowed as a place of custody for souls, in which angels are appointed as guardians to them. . . .the just are guided to the right hand, and are led with hymns sung by the angels appointed over that place, unto a region of light. . . with whom there is no place of toil, no burning heat, no piercing cold,. . . while they wait for that rest and eternal new life in heaven, which is to succeed this region. This place we call The Bosom of Abraham. But as to the unjust, they are dragged by force to the left hand, by the angels allotted for punishment, no longer going with a good will. . . Now those angels that are set over these souls, drag them into the neighborhood of hell itself; who, when they are hard by it, continually hear the noise of it, and do not stand clear of the hot vapour itself; but when they have a nearer view of this spectacle, as of a terrible and exceeding great prospect of fire, they are struck with a fearful expectation of a future judgment, and in effect punished thereby. . . even hereby are they punished; for a chasm deep and large is fixed between them; insomuch that a just man that hath compassion upon them, cannot be admitted, nor can one that is unjust, if he were bold enough to attempt it, pass over it." (Josephus Complete Works, trans. by William Whiston, p.637).
Sounds strikingly similar to Enoch to me. The mythological view of Lk. 16 on Lazarus & the Rich man is neo-Sadduceeism where the man Lazarus and the rich man are seen as a myths borrowed from the Hellenistic culture to tell a moral lesson. Seventh-Day Adventists, Jehovah’s Witness and Mormons all fall into this old error.
Some would now ask so where is Satan or the fallen angels? Do they have conscious eternal punishment post-A.D. 70? Good question. Refer first to I Pet. 2:4 and Jude 6. The N.T. through the Book of Revelation states that at A.D. 70 the reprobate are thrown into gehenna. Does gehenna imply destruction of body or of their power he had previously held. The Greek word for destroy has several meanings and the one used for the devil in Revelation is to destroy. This does not mean Satan and his devils are destroyed or burned up physically in hell, tarturus, or gehenna. What of tarturus then or gehenna? Allow me to turn to Enoch again.
Enoch chapter 21: 4-6 on Tarturus: *notice differences from Abraham’s bosom, Hades.
“4. From there I afterwards passed on to another terrific place;
5. Where I beheld the operation of a great fire blazing and glittering, in the midst of which there was a division. Columns of fire struggled together to the end of the abyss, and deep was their descent. But neither its measurement nor magnitude was I able to discover; neither could I perceive its origin. Then I exclaimed, How terrible is this place, and how difficult to explore!
6. Uriel, one of the holy angels who was with me, answered and said: Enoch, why are you alarmed and amazed at this terrific place, at the sight of this place of suffering? This, he said, is the prison of the angels; and here they are kept for ever.
Obviously, tarturus or gehenna, would be the fallen angels last estate deemed forever. Gehenna the ‘fiery pit’ is quite close in description in Greek mythology and the Bible to ‘tarturus’. In reality they are one in the same. One term stressing the abyss or depth of it. The other the fire and eternalness of the place.
Observations on Tarturus:
1. Equivalent to gehenna. i.e. the fiery pit outside historic Jerusalem. i.e. the Valley of Hinnom.
2. Eternal place of punishment for Satan and the fallen angels.
3. Both seen as a deep pit and as a fiery.
4. Lower & deeper than hades.
5. Horrible place of eternal punishment.
Comparison between Hades & gehenna, or tarturus:
1. Hades was also known in Christ’s day as Abraham’s bosom to the Hebrews.
2. Hades had two receptacles pre-A.D. 70:
a. The place of the reprobate awaiting A.D. 70 judgment.
b. Paradise, or Abraham’s bosom.
3. Tarturus is the eternal ‘the pit or abyss’ is the Greek equivalent of gehenna.
4. Gehenna is not made of fire which burns the fallen angels up, or the reprobate souls.
5. In A.D. 70, Christ opened the prison doors for the righteous in Abraham’s bosom therefore, emptying this region and taking captivity captive.
6. Hell is real. Satan and the reprobate are there since A.D. 70.
It is clear with the biblical and “extra-biblical” sources we have that Hades was the Greek concept of Abraham’s bosom. That souls or men were conscious there up until Jesus came and unlocked the prison in A.D. 70 and set the captives free. As for the reprobate unjust, well, they got to stay until they got thrown into the tarturus or gehenna.
Hades had compartments, that is Abraham’s bosom and the place of punishment. Nothing indicates they were unconscious there, quite the contrary. To say or imply that Jesus borrowed Hellenistic usages that were unreal and were mere myths strikes at the heart of the gospel. I urge all to carefully reread the passages in the O.T. referring to Sheol with a concordance. You will find the grave mentioned where one has no remembrance or other faculties. Of course not! Our physical remains have no faculties remaining. On the other hand we do as “we” continue on beyond the grave. Sheol was a conscious, real place with departments for the good and bad. Please also read the Book of Enoch and Josephus discourse on Hades for yourselves.
Even though tarturus i.e. “Hell” was symbolized by Jesus’ valley of Hinnom or gehenna, this does not preclude it’s eternalness, or that the souls there were not there and not conscious. The reprobate and fallen angels are there now being in conscious torment forever. The evidence biblical & extra-biblical evidence shows that “Hell” is real and abiding. The Dispensationalist futurists we all know may not have the timing of the ‘parousia’ correct and may be inconsistent in how they define hell, but they believe it. They are right on that at least. We should practice as recommended by our brother and fellow preterist John Bray frequently put on the back of his little tracts, “Dig deeper”. Praise God, I am thankful for what He has shown. I pray all of you readers feel the same. I pray Jeremy "dig deeper" likewise. Thank you for your article to jar this one loose.
We now have New Jerusalem the Holy instead of facing waiting for salvation from Hades. We are free from the prison now. If we are in Christ no one can snatch us out of His hands. He chose you and predestined you to salvation since before the world began and died for you that we may have eternal life. Why not follow Christ and preach His glorious Kingdom?
For Christ & Kingdom,
Paul Anderson
Planalmira, Brazil
|
| |
 |
^^Go to Top - E-mail to Friend - Print - View PDF - Subscribe - Comments RSS
Re: Jesus, Hades and Mythology (Score: 1)
by Virgil on Friday, April 27 @ 06:38:49 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | Hades - Greek meaning the Unseen realm. Pre- A.D. 70 two receptacles:
1. Abraham’s bosom - resting place of departed righteous awaiting the anastasis (rising) in A.D. 70.
2. Place of torment – place where reprobate awaited judgment of A.D. 70.
Paul, your article is based on a false premise in my opinion. You should not be defining Hades as you have done above. You are injecting Jewish mythology (Abraham's bosom) into Greek mythology (Hades). That is a serious error.
To get the definition of a word and its use, we should not look in a modern or contemporary dictionary. Rather we should attempt to research original literature and writings which give us a cultural and anthropological connection to that time period which is of concern to us.
In Greek mythology, Hades was the place where all mortals would go, and generally speaking there was no reward or punishment specifically given to people in Hades. To get Hell and eternal conscious torment out of Greek mythology is a leap of logic. |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by Mick on Friday, April 27 @ 09:05:03 PDT
- by Virgil on Friday, April 27 @ 09:47:54 PDT
- by Jer on Friday, April 27 @ 10:37:22 PDT
- by Virgil on Friday, April 27 @ 10:58:02 PDT
- by Ed on Friday, April 27 @ 11:44:23 PDT
- by Virgil on Friday, April 27 @ 12:22:37 PDT
- by MiddleKnowledge on Friday, April 27 @ 13:58:47 PDT
- by Fredrico on Friday, April 27 @ 14:49:47 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Friday, April 27 @ 17:08:30 PDT
- by Virgil on Friday, April 27 @ 19:14:14 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Saturday, April 28 @ 07:39:06 PDT
Re: Jesus, Hades and Mythology (Score: 1)
by Jer on Friday, April 27 @ 06:46:29 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | Hi Paul:
Thanks for the lengthy reply. I do have some issues with your approach. First of all, I don't agree with your definitions of Hades. That's one of the things we're seeking to prove so you can't use the conclusion to support your premises. That's petitio principii.
Regarding Eph 4:10 and 1 Peter 3, you brought the same assumptions to the text that Ed did. You didn't actually demonstrate anything.
Math. 12:40 is a not issue. It reflects Jewish cosmology.
Lk. 23:43 contains the word "paradise." You must supply the extra meaning. In 2 Cor. Paul equates "paradise" with the "third heaven." It was apparently up, reflecting Jewish cosmology, not down as you assume.
Phil 2 reflects Jewish cosmology.
Your section on Luke 16 is a mass of assertions. For example, you said, "He used the word Hades to describe Abraham’s bosom [i.e., the Underworld, JL] more clearly for all his audience." You did not demonstrate this from the text. You make the same assumption that Ed made. You went on to say, "He used gehenna to address the future of eternal conscious punishment for the reprobate..." Jesus never uses Gehenna to address "eternal conscious torment." You have read that into the text without showing us how or why. And Finally, "The important issue he was illustrating in this term [Gehenna] was the fact that the fires and the trash burned there continually in the ‘Valley of Hinnom’. Gehenna was therefore, a parabolic term for future eternal conscious punishment of the wicked." There is nothing to suggest "eternal conscious torment." You can't just assert your position without demonstrating it from the text and giving reasonable arguments as to why I should accept it.
I have already shown the Greek myth in Enoch with Azazel / Prometheus, not to mention the direct evidence from Orphic tradition and Enoch's underworld.
Josephus’ Discourse to Greeks on Hades was incorrectly attributed to him by the Greek theologian Photius in the 9th century. It belongs to Hippolytus under the title Against Plato, on the Cause of the Universe. I would expect it to be similar to Luke 16:19-31. It was probably his source.
Enoch and Josephus/Hippolytus derive from the same source, Greek myth.
I addressed 1 Peter 2:4 in the footnotes. The same applies to Jude.
In summary, I'm afraid you haven't actually addressed my points. Your response starts off by assuming the conclusion, i.e., the parabolic underworld of Luke 16 reflects reality. Yet you did not demonstrate this. You simply continued to assert it. The texts you cited (e.g., Mt 12, Eph 4) do not present a problem for my view. In other texts, 1 Peter 3 for example, you assumed your position and read it into the text. Regarding Enoch, you did not explain why these are not related to myth by directly addressing the evidence I presented. You incorrectly attributed the Discourse on Hades to Josephus to bolster your position. Yet this writing belongs to Hippolytus who lived a few centuries later. Your position ignores the evidence and must appeal to the myths contained in Enoch and Josephus / Hippolytus which are then read back into scripture. The result is a disparity between OT Sheol and NT Hades. My view presents a consistent picture.
Again, thank you for the reply. I do appreciate your consideration.
Jeremy |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by OSTRALOA on Friday, April 27 @ 08:08:03 PDT
- by Jer on Friday, April 27 @ 09:10:03 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Friday, April 27 @ 13:51:03 PDT
Samuel (Score: 1)
by Kyle Peterson (peterson.kyle@gmail.com) on Friday, April 27 @ 12:04:50 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | This may or may not be immediately relevant:
Where did Samuel come from when the witch of Endor summoned him, and was able to comprehend what was going on.
And as previously mentioned, Christ descended into somewhere for three days (but was not abandoned).
These two accounts (and perhaps King David's) seem to be the only reliable means for deciphering what the afterlife was truly like. I say was because I believe it to have been emptied and destroyed in 70AD. |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by Ed on Friday, April 27 @ 12:56:04 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Friday, April 27 @ 13:20:31 PDT
- by Ed on Friday, April 27 @ 16:14:57 PDT
- by Ed on Friday, April 27 @ 16:30:22 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Friday, April 27 @ 16:52:33 PDT
- by Fredrico on Friday, April 27 @ 21:40:14 PDT
- by Ed on Friday, April 27 @ 22:28:31 PDT
- by Fredrico on Monday, April 30 @ 15:38:14 PDT
- by Ed on Monday, April 30 @ 16:06:05 PDT
- by Fredrico on Monday, April 30 @ 16:20:17 PDT
- by Ed on Monday, April 30 @ 18:09:37 PDT
Re: Enoch (Score: 1)
by PeytonLucy on Sunday, April 29 @ 14:06:00 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | Paul,
You wrote "The facts are the Book of Enoch was purposely deleted out of the Hebrew canon in A.D. 90 by the reconvened Sanhedrin Council of Yavne called by Yohannan ben Zakkai and Simon ben Gamaliel II due to it’s references to the Son of Man, the Elect One and the Messiah as Enoch describes Jesus Christ whom their immediate elders had crucified." What is your evidence that Enoch was part of the Hebrew canon? Also, please provide a little detail and documentation about the supposed de-canonization that you describe.
God Bless,
peytonlucy
|
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by Starlight on Sunday, April 29 @ 16:14:24 PDT
- by PeytonLucy on Monday, April 30 @ 06:31:09 PDT
- by Starlight on Monday, April 30 @ 08:22:41 PDT
- by PeytonLucy on Monday, April 30 @ 11:11:31 PDT
- by Starlight on Monday, April 30 @ 11:40:43 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Monday, April 30 @ 12:49:00 PDT
- by Starlight on Monday, April 30 @ 13:17:38 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Monday, April 30 @ 17:19:25 PDT
- by Starlight on Tuesday, May 01 @ 07:15:38 PDT
- by PeytonLucy on Monday, April 30 @ 14:10:40 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Monday, April 30 @ 17:20:27 PDT
- by PeytonLucy on Tuesday, May 01 @ 13:40:51 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Wednesday, May 02 @ 04:10:55 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Wednesday, May 02 @ 13:04:18 PDT
- by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 06:23:38 PDT
- by Starlight on Wednesday, May 02 @ 07:05:27 PDT
- by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 09:51:50 PDT
- by Starlight on Wednesday, May 02 @ 11:37:27 PDT
- by PeytonLucy on Wednesday, May 02 @ 13:09:36 PDT
- by Starlight on Wednesday, May 02 @ 14:26:16 PDT
- by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 13:42:45 PDT
- by Starlight on Wednesday, May 02 @ 15:17:05 PDT
- by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 17:52:12 PDT
- by Starlight on Wednesday, May 02 @ 19:38:53 PDT
- by Jer on Thursday, May 03 @ 19:18:25 PDT
- by Starlight on Thursday, May 03 @ 20:25:52 PDT
- by Jer on Friday, May 04 @ 05:33:41 PDT
- by MiddleKnowledge on Friday, May 04 @ 06:15:46 PDT
Re: Jesus, Hades and Mythology (Score: 1)
by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 06:51:39 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | The Son of Man (37-71) section, which is unaccounted for among the Enoch fragments of the Dead Sea Scrolls, is believed to be a later addition. Some date this section as late as the third century AD. Others, date it somewhere between the first century BC and the first century AD. In either case, it doesn't appear to be part of the original composition as it is only found in the Ethiopic version. (The Pseudepigrapha and Modern Research, p. 98)
In light of that, I must question the legitimacy Paul's statement: "The facts are the Book of Enoch was purposely deleted out of the Hebrew canon in A.D. 90 by the reconvened Sanhedrin Council of Yavne called by Yohannan ben Zakkai and Simon ben Gamaliel II due to it’s references to the Son of Man..." These may not have been written at this time. However, there is another problem.
The council he is referring to is only hypothetical: "Heinrich Graetz introduced the notion in 1871; based on Mishnaic and Talmudic sources, he concluded that there had been a Council of Jamnia which had decided the Jewish canon sometime in the late 1st century. This became the prevailing scholarly consensus for much of the 20th century. However, from the 1960s onwards, based on the work of Jack P. Lewis, Sidney Z. Leiman, and others, this view came increasingly into question. In particular, later scholars noted that none of the sources actually mentioned books that had been withdrawn from a canon, and questioned the whole premise that the discussions were about canonicity at all, asserting that they were actually dealing with other concerns entirely." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Jamnia)
Despite the fact that the Son of Man sayings may not have been written until a later date, no book was mentioned by name. So, then, how can one say, "The facts are the Book of Enoch was purposely deleted out of the Hebrew canon in A.D. 90... due to it’s references to the Son of Man"? Where is the evidence to support this statement?
When asked for evidence concerning Enoch's canonicity among Christians at Pella, Paul admits, "I cannot prove with evidence that the Pella Christians held the Book of Enoch in their accepted scriptures, but I assume they did..."
Yet he made this statement in the article: "This means that with certainty the Pella community of Christians would have upheld Enoch's canonicity..."
And again in subsequent comments: "Yet, many of the earliest Christians not only upheld The Book of Enoch as valid, but accepted it’s canonicity. The Pella Christians did..."
Paul also states, "Among the early Christians, Tertullian circa A.D. 200 is quoted from a work as bluntly stating that the 'Jews have taken the Book of Enoch out of Hebrew canon due to it’s prophecies concerning Christ'."
He does not provide us with a source. Tertullian wrote, "[1] I am aware that the Scripture of Enoch, which has assigned this order (of action) to angels, is not received by some, because it is not admitted into the Jewish canon either. I suppose they did not think that, having been published before the deluge, it could have safely survived that world-wide calamity, the abolisher of all things..."
And again: "But since Enoch in the same Scripture has preached likewise concerning the Lord, nothing at all must be rejected by us which pertains to us; and we read that every Scripture suitable for edification is divinely inspired. By the Jews it may now seem to have been rejected for that (very) reason, just like all the other (portions) nearly which tell of Christ." (http://www.tertullian.org/anf/anf04/anf04-06.htm#3_1)
Where does Tertullian state, "Jews have taken the Book of Enoch out of Hebrew canon due to it’s prophecies concerning Christ"? Where does Tertullian state that it was in their canon to begin with?
One does not have to agree with my position to recognize that Paul is making many claims th
Read the rest of this comment... |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by Ed on Wednesday, May 02 @ 07:02:19 PDT
- by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 07:25:17 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Wednesday, May 02 @ 09:19:00 PDT
- by Ed on Wednesday, May 02 @ 09:32:16 PDT
- by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 09:46:15 PDT
- by MiddleKnowledge on Wednesday, May 02 @ 10:16:51 PDT
- by MiddleKnowledge on Wednesday, May 02 @ 10:16:52 PDT
- by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 10:42:15 PDT
- by MiddleKnowledge on Wednesday, May 02 @ 14:26:26 PDT
- by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 15:11:56 PDT
- by MiddleKnowledge on Wednesday, May 02 @ 15:47:50 PDT
- by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 09:50:30 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Wednesday, May 02 @ 10:30:01 PDT
- by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 11:23:36 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Wednesday, May 02 @ 12:53:58 PDT
- by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 13:14:25 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Wednesday, May 02 @ 13:35:09 PDT
- by Jer on Wednesday, May 02 @ 13:52:54 PDT
- by PeytonLucy on Wednesday, May 02 @ 17:11:15 PDT
- by Starlight on Wednesday, May 02 @ 18:55:28 PDT
Hell.... (Score: 1)
by TheIdealNate on Wednesday, May 02 @ 13:08:47 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | Some people might claim that people here are denying hell. I would disagree. Hell needs to be defined. (And done well here, though this issue I will never be 100% on). When scripture over and over describe 2 different things with the same name, it is either because:
A. They are both true
B. One stands for the other, one is metaphor or a "type."
C. Coincidence...
Though inclined to side with the article above, here is why I do not care.
Scaring someone into heaven by pointing out hell NEVER SAVED ANYONE! It is not the fires of hell or the torment to follow that draw men to Christ, it is Grace. It was the knowledge and acknowledgment of ones own sin and desire to change their heart that causes conversion.
Look at the thief on the cross, he was saved because he looked at our innocent lord, understood the love in Christ's sacrifice, and repented. The other thief couldn't care a lick about hell. He might as well have proclaimed boldly "I'm on the highway to hell." The second thief (naughty one) was PROUD! It was his inability to humble himself to that other victim on the cross (Christ) which kept him mocking.
Actually, I would believe that it is the simple fear of being DEAD (over and done with) that scares the majority of dying men. People need to come to Christ out of humility and a desire to LIVE LIFE ETERNAL with HIM, not out of fear of that nasty hot black flame that melts my skin off over and over and over and over and over......... |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by davo on Wednesday, May 02 @ 14:42:10 PDT
- by TheIdealNate on Wednesday, May 02 @ 19:22:40 PDT
- by davo on Wednesday, May 02 @ 20:40:41 PDT
Re: Jesus, Hades and Mythology (Score: 1)
by OSTRALOA on Wednesday, May 02 @ 16:22:22 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | For all readers,
Until my book is out on the Book of Enoch, I will leave with you all with the sources mentioned at the bottom of this post to see for yourself the Book of Enoch is accepted as "Canon" to the ancient Ethiopian Orthodox Church. For early Church Father & rabbinical sources I will quote in full in my book, Eschatology & The Kingdom of God in the Book of Enoch.
Before concluding the Book of Enoch to be uninspired or "Greek myth" I advise all to familiarize yourselves on the "Sethite doctrine" of Gen. 6 and it's implication as to the "Real" reason why the Book of Enoch was finally left or "buried" in the sands of time. Thank God it's been now unburied for all Christians to see the reality of the biblical truths contained therein. Thank you all for your posts and comments.
For Christ & Kingdom,
Paul Anderson
Planalmira, Brazil
Ge'ez & Amharic Bible sources:
1. Mäshaf qeddus bäge `ezenna bä' amarenna yätäsafä, prepared in Geez and Amharic by 1927 E. C. and produced by photolithography in London (undated) 4 vols.
2. Mäshaf qeddus, yäbeluyenna yähaddis kidan mäsaheft, Amharic, A. A. 1953 E. C. |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
Re: Jesus, Hades and Mythology (Score: 1)
by mazuur on Thursday, May 03 @ 07:38:00 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | I have been reading the many post here and I am still confused as to the positions by most. It would help if people were to layout a simple map showing the status of dead ones *only* prior to and after AD70. Then it would be much easier to understand what any given person is trying to say. For example, one such map may be as follows:
Pre AD 70
1) Believers are in Sheol
2) Unbelievers are in Sheol
3) Sheol is one compartment containing both per OT revelation.
4) Then we learn Sheol equals Hades per NT revelation
- Hades consist of two compartments
- A) one compartment is Abraham's bosom which is equal to Paradise.
- B) Second compartment is Tartarus which contains the unbelievers.
AD 70
1) Jesus resurrects both righteous and unrighteous.
2) Righteous go with Christ into God's presence (led captives in this train).
3) Unrighteous are destroyed in Gehenna (lake of fire) and cease to exist.
Post AD 70
1) Believers upon death translate into the spiritual realm entering into a richer experience of God's presence (heaven?).
2) Unbelievers are destroyed (Gehenna/lake of fire) and cease to exist.
-Rich
P.S. This is not necessarily my view, just an example. |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by davo on Thursday, May 03 @ 09:12:35 PDT
- by mazuur on Thursday, May 03 @ 09:36:26 PDT
- by davo on Thursday, May 03 @ 11:53:43 PDT
- by mazuur on Thursday, May 03 @ 12:33:31 PDT
- by davo on Thursday, May 03 @ 23:04:04 PDT
- by mazuur on Friday, May 04 @ 08:19:55 PDT
- by davo on Saturday, May 05 @ 10:34:52 PDT
Re: Jesus, Hades and Mythology (Score: 1)
by OSTRALOA on Thursday, May 03 @ 18:19:13 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | For Davo, Rich and other readers:
Writing the initial post I have some clarification which may be helpful. I will probably earn the wrath of Jeremy, Ed & Virgil, but here it goes. I will make it as brief and clear as possible. I am writing with the conviction the Book of Enoch is not based on “Greek myth” neither that the sayings of Jesus concerning Hades were either. Jesus was not using regional connotations for His audience. He stated truths regarding “Hell” not limited to A.D. 70 only, but for eternity. That Sheol in the O.T. can either mean the grave or the “unseen realm” under the earth. Hell therefore in the O.T. means one or the other in their respective places.
To begin with a verse:
1. Matt. 25:46 Jesus concludes with the verse, “into eternal punishment”. (Gr. eis kolasin aionion) i.e. into torment (punishment) eternal.
No gehenna mentioned, or tarturus mentioned either here in this verse. The Greek word tense for the word “aionion” means in the sense everlasting as it is used in other places to describe eternal life. Obviously this same word tense used also for eternal life is applicable as to the state of being “everlasting” as to heaven’s nature, as well as being eternal individually, otherwise once a person would be in heaven it would only be temporary for the individual. Therefore, neither eternal punishment or eternal life is temporary, nor is either restricted to A.D. 70 fulfillment only.
On the basis of my unanswered post to Virgil, I will make the brief definitions regarding “Hell” as follows:
1. Hades = Gk. word for the Unseen realm. General place of departed souls pre-A.D. 70. Having two receptacles pre-A.D. 70.
a. Place of torment for reprobate, pre-A.D. 70 and forever. Unrighteous are not “anastasized” or “raised” from this realm. Mentioned in Lk. 16. as place of fire and torment. (This receptacle of Hades/Sheol was not emptied in A.D. 70).
*In the Book of Enoch described as a hollow place in the cavities of the earth for punishment of the reprobate. Souls are described not being either annihilated or raised at the time of “great judgment”, but remaining there forever in punishment. (This place is not called Hades or tarturus in the entire book).
b. Place of bliss or “Paradise” (see also Abraham’s bosom below). Mentioned in Lk. 16 as Abraham’s bosom. (Emptied in A.D. 70).
*In the Book of Enoch described as the hollow place in the cavities of the earth for the place of departed righteous souls near the place of torment, but separated by a great gulf as in Lk. 16.
2. Gehenna = Heb. word used by Jesus to describe both the “regional” reference of the Valley of Hinnom and at the same time being the reality of the receptacle of eternal conscious punishment in Hades for the unrighteous souls both pre- and post- A.D. 70. (Not emptied in A.D. 70).
3. Tarturus = Gk. word for Abyss of fire or deep place. Place of eternal punishment for fallen angels.
*In the Book of Enoch called the “Abyss of fire” where the fallen angels are punished forever for their sins.
4. Abraham’s bosom = receptacle of Hades called “Paradise”, or Abraham’s bosom in the N.T. The place of the departed souls of the righteous pre-A.D. 70. Righteous souls here “Anastisized” i.e. “raised” not “resurrected” in A.D. 70 into heaven.
*In the Book of Enoch mentioned as the place of bliss, or receptacle of righteous souls.
5. Paradise = The receptacle of Hades/Sheol referring to the place of departed righteous souls. Same place as no. 1b & 4 above.(Emptied in A.D. 70).
6. Sheol = General Heb. word for Hades, Unseen realm.
*Hell in O.T. mistranslated in many English versions should be grave, but not all cases.
Therefore, hell as used in the O.T. rightly should translate to both the grave and Sheol.
I hope this summary helps out some readers. May the Lord bless you.
For C
Read the rest of this comment... |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by Ed on Saturday, May 05 @ 11:55:27 PDT
- by OSTRALOA on Saturday, May 05 @ 12:53:37 PDT
|
|