Welcome to Planet Preterist
Search Site:     
Submit an article | Submit a link
3259 articles; 634 encyclopedia terms
 Submit  Links  Exclusives  Forum  Downloads  RSS Feeds New Account
Planet Preterist Blogs
Tools & Links
Login
Nickname

Password

Please create a free account to post in the forums, submit articles, links...etc.
Funny Stuff
You don't have a god in you, you are one.
-- Kenneth Copeland, "The Force Of Love" tape # 02-0028
Our Columnists
Catalog Items
Exclusive: The Deep and Endless Story of Creation
Posted on Thursday, August 10 @ 20:16:32 PDT by Virgil Vaduva

PlanetPreterist Columns by Virgil Vaduva
Do you remember you first crush or first love? I do. Her name was Violet; she sat next to me in fifth grade. She was a redhead and I thought I was crazy about her. We were separated by a partition littered with lab bottles and tubes that split the Chemistry lab through the middle, and in the beginning I really did not know how to speak with her, but as time passed we started exchanging hand-written notes over the glass partition; they were written in code. Soon we were doing each other favors, like buying snacks and ice-cream on breaks; it really was the only way for two kids to show how much we liked each other.

When God began to create heaven and earth, it is evident that He decided to write the redemption story and the story of His love, forgiveness and acceptance of mankind all over the creation he was about to craft. In a very poetic and powerful way God has weaved himself and his plan of restoration and reconciliation throughout the creation story in such a way that it would be nearly impossible to be missed in its Jewish context.

Christians love studying and talking about eschatology, but as I have said it before, in order to understand eschatology (the study of last things) we need to make an effort to better study and understand the first things, that is the account, purpose and typological relevance of the Creation story.

Before I continue, I must first confess that I shamelessly took some of the ideas contained in this article from Rob Bell's presentation Everything is Spiritual. But Rob's presentation was only a beginning for my exploration of the links between Creation and Redemption; and it very much ties into my earlier article titled Fear, Love and the Kingdom, in which I explored how God has been always furiously pursuing mankind, never giving up on us, never abandoning us, always willing to love, accept and forgive our sin.

Not a God of separation

The first key lesson we learn from the narrative of Creation, is that God is a God that brings order to chaos, and fills what is empty. The original language of Genesis 1 seems to illustrate that God did create Earth out of pre-existing matter. A literal translation of Genesis 1:1 would start like this:

"When God began to create heaven and earth…"[1]

While the point of this article is not to debate this passage, it is worth pointing out the differences in the ancient and modern paradigms. To modern people, the lack of something, or the lack of Creation is "nothingness" while to the ancients, the lack of life was something much worse than "nothingness." It was chaos and disorder. Mircea Eliade also illustrates this very well when he discusses the dichotomy of sacred and profane space. To Eliade, the opposite of the sacred is not merely the profane, but chaos, a territory emptied of ontic substance, emptied even of nothingness.[2] What was lacking therefore was an ontological aspect to Creation, and perhaps not necessarily atoms or matter as we think of it in the physical sense.

The act of creation alone gives us a picture of a God that does not settle for a chaotic existence, but a God that longs for order and structure. In essence, the creation itself took upon the sacred nature of the Creator and thus has become a self-identified space full of God’s notes and messages throughout. This structure is further illustrated through a highly symmetrical creation account that as we all know takes place over a period of six days. Take a look at this pattern presented in the Creation account:

In day one God separated light from the darkness and created light.

In day two God separated the waters from waters and created heaven.

In day three God separated land and waters and created land and seas.

In day four God fills up what he separated in day one.

In day five God fills up what he separated in day two.

In day six God fills up what he separated in day three.

As a result we observe the symmetry of God creating general domains in the first three days of creation, then filling up those domains with their proper inhabitants in the subsequent three days of creation. The theme is recurring throughout the story: chaos to order, death to life, empty to full, separation to unification.

As it is usual throughout the Bible and Hebrew culture, certain numbers are also highly relevant in the creation account. The phrase "And God saw that was good" appears exactly seven times. The word "God" appears thirty five times (seven times five) and the section devoted to the seventh day has exactly thirty five words in it.[3] The entire story also contains exactly 414 words with the most important word – which is therefore the main point of the poem – being located exactly in the middle. The word in this instance is the word "seasons" or "feasts" which is an overt anticipation of the seventh day, a day of celebration and rest. The Creation story is as much a story about God's creation of the world as it is a story about God celebrating the Creation and even anticipating its redemption long before Adam and Even sinned.

There is a bigger story

Many Jewish scholars have pointed out throughout history that the story or poem of Creation[4] closely resembles the story of the construction of the tabernacle.[5] In fact Isaiah, speaking on God’s behalf, is quick to point out that “Heaven is my throne and the Earth is my footstool.” Consequently the layout of the temple was very much presented as a microcosm of the world. As the ziggurat typified a mountain and land, “the sea” typified the sea itself; in essence, the Temple became a very real and literal residence of God, just as the whole Creation has been apparently intended to be.

Evidently, the very act of Creating was meant to teach us a much bigger and more important story, namely that our God is not a God of separation, but one of restoration, not one of division, but one of favor and grace. This is further illustrated after Adam and Eve sinned when God cared for them even after their fall. Whatever shame and nakedness was exposed because of sin, God covered it up.[6] The same is noticed after Cain becomes a murderer. God severely threatens anyone who would attempt to kill Cain, and gives him a sign of protection and grace.[7]

This pattern of one-sided grace and communion on God’s part is strangely present throughout the Scriptures. I say strangely because modern Christianity has conditioned many of us to think of God as a God of vengeance, hate and punishment, a God that can only be satisfied when he finally gets us to pay for our sin and wickedness. But what may seem strange to us really is a normal occurrence in the Scripture. In fact, in my studies I was surprised to see the quick response and relief God was willing to give to mankind as a result of the Fall. We often are being reminded of The Curse God placed on mankind after the Fall, however almost everyone chooses to skip the quick relief given by God not long after.

Thus another quite strange verse appears in Genesis 5, a verse that has been much debated by Rabbis. When Noah was born, Lamech made a very extraordinary proclamation: “This one will give us rest from our work and from the toil of our hands arising from the ground which the LORD has cursed.[8]

In Genesis 6, a quick account of man’s growing wickedness is given, with God shows regret and sorrow for creating man, yet suddenly Noah’s name appears again: “But Noah found favor in the eyes of the LORD.”[9] Jewish scholars have always been quick to point out that Noah’s name (n-h) is simply h-n spelled backwards, which is the word for favor. God has shown favor to Noah, and according to Lamech’s word, has shown favor to all mankind, Noah being in essence a New Adam providing relief from extreme labor and an end to The Curse!

A day of rest

What is surprising about Noah’s story is that in contrast with Noah's purpose given by Scripture, we often enjoy harping and complaining about the “sin nature” of the world, and how hard it is to work and labor to satisfy our most basic needs. But this kind of attitude is illustrative of the greater problem with westerners’ understanding of Jewish Scriptures. We focus on the letters and words on the page, apply strict hermeneutical principles to the passages, work hard at translating words properly yet we completely miss the higher meaning of the greater narrative: in this instance, it is quite evident that what God cursed in Genesis 3, God fixed in Genesis 5. Noah’s birth and arrival brought about the same rest that God longed for after Creation and The Fall: a Sabbath from The Curse. The seventh day therefore, when God rested after creating seems to has been a type for both a Noah's fulfillment of his purpose (to put a stop to The Curse), and the coming of the Kingdom of God, the completion of the New Creation in which all things are fulfilled, all things are reconciled and filled with God's presence and glory. This is no small matter as Christians should realize the fact that we do live in a Sabbath in which prophecy, grace and glory have all been fulfilled, in which we all rest and celebrate liberation from sin and bondage.

To take this to an even greater scale, the New Creation (which many Preterists claim to live in now) is really the loudest example of what our God is all about. In 2 Cor. 5, Paul wrote “Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come.” Paul adds a whole new facet to God’s creative process: God is a God of renewing and filling, a God that does not settle for empty space and separation and chaos. God brings freedom to those imprisoned by old things.

In my last article here I pointed out how Jesus read Isaiah 61 and proclaimed it fulfilled on that day. Isaiah 61 speaks about good news for the poor, sight to the blind and freedom for prisoners. What is interesting though, is that Isaiah is simply reiterating Leviticus 25:10, which defines the Year of the Jubilee, which Israel was to celebrate every fifty years. This was a year when slaves and prisoners would be freed, when separated families would be reunited, and everyone would party and celebrate because the ultimate Sabbath was there.

The Scriptural and historical examples never cease to amaze me. In 586 B.C. Israel lost its land and was forced into slavery, into a foreign land. Exactly fifty years later, Cyrus issued a decree that freed all the Jewish prisoners and allowed them to return home and rejoin with their long-lost friends and families. Therefore the Year of the Jubilee, and Isaiah’s words read by Jesus had a special place in the hearts of the Jewish people. By proclaiming those words fulfilled again, Jesus reiterated God’s absolute and unreserved love for mankind, his crush on us that does not seem to end.

Jesus proclaimed this reunion and recreation when he read Isaiah 61, yet many Christians continue to wait and long for a future that is already here. The poem of Creation has at its Hebrew center a message of celebration and joy, not one of Western desperation and brokenness. The seasons (or feasts of celebration) at the center of Creation are the same seasons and feasts celebrated by Jesus as having been fulfilled; they carry a message of love, joy and grace, a message that fulfills, not one that empties.

God’s crush on us is written all over the Bible. Sometimes he is writing to us in code, like spelling Noah’s name backwards to show us favor in a not so blatant way, to let us want more of him, to not be satisfied with just saying “I love you.” Some other times he cannot contain his love for us and reaches across the separating partition, telling us he longs to be with us. He came to “save sinners” not to destroy those living “ignorantly in unbelief.”[10]

My study of the story of Creation has proven to be one of the most challenging and enlightening studies I have done so far. The first two chapters of Genesis are likely the two most fascinating and complex pieces of literature ever written, with countless levels of significance, and a good deal symbolism and substance found in every word. The story of Creation is really telling us a much larger story, about the kind of God we serve and about his love for his Creation. The message is simple yet complex, powerful yet persuasive, unparalleled yet lowly and humble: What has been separated, God has rejoined; what was divided, God has reunited; what was broken, God fixed. Today, God has filled the Creation with what was missing...himself.

[1] See the Tanakh

[2] Mircea Eliade, The Sacred and the Profane

[3] Genesis 2:1-2

[4] Genesis 1:1-2:3

[5] See Exodus 25-31; Exodus 35-40; Genesis 2:1-3 and Exodus 39:32, 42-43

[6] See Genesis 3:21

[7] See Genesis 4:15

[8] Genesis 5:29

[9] Genesis 6:8

[10] See 1 Timothy 1:13,15



------

Virgil Vaduva is a columnist for PlanetPreterist.com.

View Virgil Vaduva archives

Note: Opinions presented on PlanetPreterist.com or by PlanetPreterist.com columnists may not necessarily reflect the position of PlanetPreterist.com, or reflect the beliefs, doctrine or theological position of all other preterists. We encourage all readers to first and foremost carefully analyze all articles in the light of God's Word.


 
Related Links
· More about PlanetPreterist Columns
· News by Virgil Vaduva


Most read story about PlanetPreterist Columns:
Login

Article Rating
Average Score: 3.8
Votes: 5


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


Options
   ^^Go to Top - E-mail to Friend - Print - View PDF View PDF -   Subscribe -   Comments RSS

"Login" | Login/Create an Account | 88 comments
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
You are not logged in! Login to post comments:

Nickname:
Password:
[ Lost your password? | Create New Account ]
Was Adam a Real Human? (Score: 1)
by valensname on Thursday, August 10 @ 22:18:49 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
I have to ask those of you who hold to an old Earth (millions/billions), Do you believe that Adam was a real human being who lived and breathed and existed on this planet Earth?

I believe the OT and NT teach that he was.

If you do then I assume you believe that Cain and Abel were real human beings who walked the Earth? That's what I believe the OT teaches and Hebrews 11. I don't see how Cain and Abel cannot be real unless the others mentioned in Hebrews 11 are not real.

Then Adam and Eve and Cain and Abel must have been real living breathing human beings. After all, Adam and Eve were their parents.

So, then you old Earthers, what do you believe the Bible means in Genesis 5:5?

"And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years. And he died."

So then if Adam's birthday, according to how I understand the Bible, was the 6th day of creation, which is also five days after the Earth was created (since Exodus 20 says God took 6 days to make everything), then one year after Day 6, Adam would have lived one year. Then two years after Day 6, then Adam would have lived two years, and so on until he died, 930 years after he began living on Day 6.

If you believe that Adam was a real person, do you believe he lived 930 years? If you don't then I can understand that you will not accept that Day 1 , Day 2, of Genesis were normal ordinary days and there is not much point in discussing how old the Earth is.

Please those of you who hold to an old Earth, what do you believe Scripture means here in Genesis 5:5?

"And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years. And he died."

Is this a literal historical fact? Is it allegory? Is is apocalyptic language? Is it a love story?

If Adam is not a real person whom does Paul compare Jesus to?

It seems to me if one doesn't believe that Adam was a real person and doesn't believe the simple statement of Genesis 5:5, then they don't either believe in the Bible or they have a low view of Scripture and let Scripture mean whatever they want it to mean.


[ To reply to this, please login or register ]

Re: The Deep and Endless Story of Creation (Score: 1)
by mazuur on Friday, August 11 @ 12:15:54 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
WOW Virgil, that was excellent! Thanks so much.

I especially love those two verses concerning Noah. Man, how many times have I read Gen 5 and never seen that verse "This one will give us rest from our work and from the toil of our hands arising from the ground which the LORD has cursed.". Never mind having ever thought about what it meant and combining that with the story of Noah. Incredible!

I am puzzled about God creating everything out of nothing.

True it seems that Gen 1:1 should read the way you stated it, but that doesn't get rid of Heb 11:3 "3By faith we understand that the worlds were prepared by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things which are visible."

Maybe I am not reading that verse correctly. It seems to support that God created everything out of nothing.

Rich


[ To reply to this, please login or register ]

Re: The Deep and Endless Story of Creation (Score: 1)
by Sam on Saturday, August 12 @ 19:29:35 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Virgil,

"And God began to create...." is not a "literal translation." "Began" is not in the verse, but is supplied by the translator(s) who think that MAYBE it is inchoative.

Sam


[ To reply to this, please login or register ]

The Bible and Time Statements (Score: 1)
by valensname on Sunday, August 13 @ 09:04:50 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Those that hold to a fulfilled eschatology view emphasize the importance of the time statements in Daniel, and other OT passages as well as the time statements in the NT regarding when Jesus was to return. We changed our paradigm from the futuristic eschatology we had been taught regarding the nature of the Parousia, based, at least for me, mainly on the time statements of Scripture. We have explained to others that when God says something was to be fulfilled, "at hand, shortly, near, this generation" etc that to honor Scripture then those time passages are valid and we need to re-examine that the nature of the Parousia isn't an Earth burning event.

Why is it that when it comes to the opening chapters of Genesis and in other passages such as Exodus 20 that render divine comment on the opening chapters of Genesis, that those who hold to a billion year old Earth then began explaining time passages regarding the days of creation in the same manner as those that hold to futuristic eschatology?

Why doesn't in 6 days God created the heavens and the earth and everything in them not mean that? Why does day in the evening and morning passages and in Exodus 20 not now mean six ordinary days time? It makes "days" and "years" in Genesis 1:14 mean nothing regarding how God is communicating what time means if day doesn't mean a day and a year mean a year. {Although I have clarified this before - And in Genesis 2:4 "day" isn't referring to an ordinary evening and morning day. According to the context the word is being used to refer to the six days God created heavens and the earth. As in my grandfather's day - meaning when he was living.}

Is it not consistent to understand the time of fulfillment regarding eschatology to be correct and the time statements regarding creation to also be correct? If not why not?

Glenn


[ To reply to this, please login or register ]

Re: The Deep and Endless Story of Creation (Score: 1)
by tresclavos on Sunday, August 13 @ 21:02:18 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
After reading the article [and the debate] I decide to dust off a translation of Genesis I have never used. Its from the translation called "The Message". I wanted to read the story of creation to my 6 year old and I figured that she will have plenty of time to get her hands into the KJV, the NIV, commentaries, the interlinear, and such when she grows up.
After reading the story of creation from "The Message" she looked at me wide eyed and said to me.. "Dad. That is Amazing! is this for real?"
"Yes, it is. Did you like the story?"
"Yeah! It would have taken God a long time to do all that stuff." She said.
"God is very patient. He did all this because he loved us. And He wanted you to be alive today."
"OH. But it would still take Him at least two years to make the whole thing."

I agree, at least two. :)
Eric Barreto


[ To reply to this, please login or register ]

Literal Language or Linguistic Prose (Score: 1)
by davo on Monday, August 14 @ 00:12:26 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message)

"In the beginning" can indicate an initial period of time, as opposed to a specific point in time. It can be understood in like fashion as the word "eschaton" in referring to an ending period of time, NOT an ending point of time, i.e., last days NOT last day – plural not singular. Here is a perfect example:

Mk 1:1 The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. – "beginning" here is the same word as per the LXX of Gen 1:1, and testifies to that which was in the throes or "beginnings" of occurring.

Further to that, it could well be that verses 3 onwards of Gen 1 are an explanation in relative specifics of the general bringing under divine order the darkness of chaos of verses one and two – thus whether "six days" be literal language or linguistic prose there could be any amount of "time" ascribed to that period where God was brooding over the face of the deep etc. Thus mankind could well be somewhat younger in an older earth.

And IF one seeks to claim consistency then how's this read:

Gen 2:4-5 This is the history [lit the generations] of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day [lit singular, thus period] that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, before any plant of the field was in the earth and before any herb of the field had grown. For the LORD God had not caused it to rain on the earth, and there was no man to till the ground.

As for the Exodus passage – it can simply be explained that such was applicable into man's timeframe regardless of how that literally worked out in God's.

davo


[ To reply to this, please login or register ]

Re: The Deep and Endless Story of Creation (Score: 1)
by mazuur on Tuesday, August 15 @ 06:20:07 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Hey Virgil,

I was reading my Bible last night (ok that is an everyday occurrence). But, due to your article, in particular Noah, I was reading through Gen 1-8.

I was especially focusing on Noah, Adam's curse in Gen 3:17-19, and Gen 8 concerning after the flood.

Here is what I found.

Here is Adam's curse from Gen. 3:17-19

"Then to Adam He said, “Because you have heeded the voice of your wife, and have eaten from the tree of which I commanded you, saying, ‘You shall not eat of it’:
Cursed is the ground for your sake;
In toil you shall eat of it
All the days of your life.

18 Both thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you,
And you shall eat the herb of the field.

19 In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread
Till you return to the ground
,
For out of it you were taken;
For dust you are,
And to dust you shall return.” "

Here God curses the ground. But as you pointed out in your article, God promised redemption from the curse through Noah.

Gen 5:28-29
Lamech lived one hundred and eighty-two years, and had a son. 29 And he called his name Noah, saying, “This one will comfort us concerning our work and the toil of our hands, because of the ground which the LORD has cursed.

Now here is what I found last night. After the flood receded, Noah opened the ark and the first thing he did was build an altar to the LORD and offered burnt offerings.

But then it says this,

Gen 8:21-22
"And the LORD smelled a soothing aroma. Then the LORD said in His heart, “I will never again curse the ground for man’s sake, although the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth; nor will I again destroy every living thing as I have done."

In order for God to say that he would never again curse the ground, the initial curse had to have been removed. This only comfirms the prophecy concerning Noah made in Gen. 5:28-29.

So, we find that indeed the curse was removed after the flood.

Also, notice God said he would never again destroy every living thing again. If the second coming was still future, and God was to make a new (physical) heaven and earth per Disp. view on 2 Peter 3 where it states,

"But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up. 11 Therefore, since all these things will be dissolved, what manner of persons ought you to be in holy conduct and godliness, 12 looking for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be dissolved, being on fire, and the elements will melt with fervent heat? 13 Nevertheless we, according to His promise, look for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells."

I would say that is destroying everything on the earth.

Rich


[ To reply to this, please login or register ]


Web site powered by Planetpreterist.com Apache Web ServerPHP Scripting Language

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners.
The comments are property of their posters, all original content © 2008 by Planetpreterist.com
You can syndicate our articles using our RSS Feeds