Welcome to Planet Preterist
Search Site:     
Submit an article | Submit a link
3275 articles; 634 encyclopedia terms
 Submit  Links  Exclusives  Forum  Downloads  RSS Feeds New Account
Planet Preterist Blogs
Tools & Links
Login
Nickname

Password

Please create a free account to post in the forums, submit articles, links...etc.
Funny Stuff
You know, a prophetess sent me a word through my wife right here, and she said 'Tell your husband that Jesus is going to physically appear in his meetings.' I'm expecting to see - I'm telling you, I feel it's going to happen.
-- Benny Hinn, TBN Praise-a-thon, April 2, 2000
Our Columnists
Catalog Items
News: American Vision: A Flood of Consistency
Posted on Sunday, July 09 @ 11:34:55 PDT by Virgil

Preterism Eric Rauch, the Director of Communications for American Vision recently wrote a two-part article attempting to deal with some issues raised by Dr. Thomas Ice regarding the Creation story, age of the earth and the Flood in his article The Logic of Biblical Creationism and The Future. The name and hermeneutic of our own columnist Timothy Martin also comes up in this debate.

Click below to read the article from American Vision:

A Flood of Consistency, Part 1

A Flood of Consistency, Part 2



 
Related Links
· IPA
· More about Preterism
· News by Virgil


Most read story about Preterism:
Login

Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


Options
   ^^Go to Top - E-mail to Friend - Print - View PDF View PDF -   Subscribe -   Comments RSS

"Login" | Login/Create an Account | 22 comments
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
You are not logged in! Login to post comments:

Nickname:
Password:
[ Lost your password? | Create New Account ]
Re: American Vision: A Flood of Consistency (Score: 1)
by JL (jlv@planetpreterist.com) on Sunday, July 09 @ 15:12:07 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Virgil,

You might want to look at what Ice said. I don't think Eric Rauch even began to answer Ice's contention.

http://www.pre-trib.org/article-view.php?id=271

Ice does claim that this is not a new argument. True, but he made a serious upgrade to it recently. His new version is devastating to YEC-preterists.

JL



[ To reply to this, please login or register ]

Re: American Vision: A Flood of Consistency (Score: 1)
by Sam on Monday, July 10 @ 20:43:14 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Tim,

The argument is sound both ways. The global flood (having universal effects) does not rule out a local judgment (Jerusalem) having universal effects. The fact that a local judgment (having universal effects) does not NECESSITATE that the Deluge was also local. It may be entirely unique in that regard (since there is nothing proving it to the contrary). In other words, there is nothing inconsistent for young earthers/global floodists to teach also the universal implications of the local judgment of Jerusalem.

The ISSUE, and ALWAYS the issue, is biblical interpretation. You have tried to demonstrate that the universal language in Genesis can mean a local event since many examples abound of "all" and "every" and "the whole world" as being local in other places in the Bible. True. However, sometimes, in many places, "all" "every" and "the whole world" are quite universal, logically speaking. The question is how we attempt to define "all" in its usages. There is a rhetorical "all" and a logical-universal qualifying "all" (like "all men are mortal").

For me, there is no biblical "proof" offered that overturns seeing II Peter 3 as local (with universal effects) and Noah as universal. Certainly, "science" can offer no "proof" of what "really happened." They were not there to "observe" it. Thus, we are left with the biblical record and two choices: local versus univeral flood, and both are quite plausible in the exegetical world (although contradictory since both cannot be true, obviously). It is to be commended and allowed as Christian and Bible-believing that local arguments still maintain that Noah was a real historical character (this has the liberals laughing right there!), and not just a "myth" or "made up fiction" to propogandize the Jehovist (J) or Elohist (E) divisions between north and south Isael. This is the most important point, and thus, I can commend your scholarship in this area. You believe the Bible. You just believe in a local judgment theory. Fine. I don't. Fine.

Since I God cured me of lust for beer, perhaps we can settle this some more over a Coke in Arizona!

Your Brother
Sam Frost


[ To reply to this, please login or register ]


Web site powered by Planetpreterist.com Apache Web ServerPHP Scripting Language

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners.
The comments are property of their posters, all original content © 2008 by Planetpreterist.com
You can syndicate our articles using our RSS Feeds