 |
 |
|
April 5, 2000. "This day begins with plague, bloodshed and all type of pestilences..." -- Michael Rood |
|
 |  |
News: Taking God's Name in Vain
Posted on Monday, January 09 @ 19:09:43 PST by Virgil |
|
By Gary DeMar
Pat Robertson has gone on record claiming that God punished Ariel Sharon with a massive stroke for “dividing God’s land.” How does Robertson know this? He doesn’t. Attaching God’s name to a claim does not make it so. Robertson violated the third commandment (Ex. 20:7) by using God’s name “in vain” to give authority to an unsubstantiated assertion. Pat Boone, yes, that Pat Boone, gets it right when he states the following: “Quoting verses from Scripture selectively and then giving them broad, generalized application in support of the side you’re advancing is akin to taking the name of the Lord in vain. . . .”
Sharon’s medical condition is more likely the result of being 77 years old, the pressure of his job, and obesity. Don’t get me wrong, God does strike down people. He did it to Nadab and Abihu (Num. 3:4), Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5:1–6), and Herod (12:23). In these cases, the Bible tells us that God brought immediate judgment and why. Determining acts of divine judgment today can be risky (Luke 13:4; John 9:1–3). Robertson went on to say:
God has enmity against those who divide my land. [Sharon] was dividing God’s land, and I would say woe unto any prime minister of Israel who takes a similar course to appease the European Union, the United Nations, or the United States of America. God says: “This land belongs to me. You’d better leave it alone.”
Robertson pointed to the Bible to make his case about the land of Israel not being divided: “In the book of Joel, the prophet Joel makes it very clear that God has ‘enmity against those who divide My land.’” It’s obvious that there is a context to Joel 3:2 that does not refer to modern-day Israel. Dispensationalists seem to believe that the only way prophecy can be fulfilled is through bloodshed. Why did God punish Sharon and not the Palestinians? They are the ones who are pushing for a divided Israel. Why doesn’t God strike down the president of Iran who believes Israel should be “wiped off the map”?
We’re back to eschatology and why it matters. Jesus Christ is the focus of history, not the land of Israel. Jesus is the fulfillment of prophecy, not ethnic Israel. Our salvation comes by way of Jesus’ shed blood, not the shed blood of Jews (Zech. 13:8) or anyone else. Dispensationalism has created a foreign policy nightmare with its insistence that Israel is still the center of history, geography, and redemption.
Charles Ryrie states that Israel is to have “permanent possession of the promised land.”2 John Walvoord concurs: “A literal interpretation of the Abrahamic covenant involves the permanent existence of Israel as a nation and the fulfillment of the promise that the land should be their everlasting possession.”3 If something is permanent, there can’t be a postponement, especially one that’s been in effect for nearly two millennia. As we stand right now, the Abrahamic covenant has been in its postponement phase longer than its fulfillment phase since dispensationalists claim that Israel never had full possession of all the land promised to them. The Israelites did enter and possess the land that God promised to give to them:
So the LORD gave Israel all the land which He had sworn to give to their fathers, and they possessed it and lived in it. And the LORD gave them rest on every side, according to all that He had sworn to their fathers, and no one of all their enemies stood before them; the LORD gave all their enemies into their hand. Not one of the good promises which the LORD had made to the house of Israel failed; all came to pass (Josh. 21:43–45).
Click here to read the entire article
|
| |
 |
|
Average Score: 3 Votes: 2
|
|
 |
^^Go to Top - E-mail to Friend - Print - View PDF - Subscribe - Comments RSS
Re: Taking God's Name in Vain (Score: 1)
by cinper on Monday, January 09 @ 23:15:16 PST (User Info | Send a Message) | Wonderful article. I have forwarded it to my Dispensationalist friends, which is practically every Christian I know.
I actually heard the pastor of the church I started attending recently close a prayer stating that "We are the last remaining generation of Christians." In service last Sunday, a woman "felt the Lord wanted her to share" Acts 2:17-21 and read it aloud, insinuating that it was for today.
I tell you, it's tough to find a balanced, preterist view out here in Torrance, California. |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by psychohmike on Tuesday, January 10 @ 01:19:58 PST
- by cinper on Tuesday, January 10 @ 08:59:02 PST
- by BigD on Tuesday, January 10 @ 11:15:15 PST
- by leslie on Tuesday, January 10 @ 14:36:55 PST
- by cinper on Tuesday, January 10 @ 17:47:24 PST
- by Waidmann on Wednesday, January 11 @ 07:10:32 PST
- by MiddleKnowledge on Wednesday, January 11 @ 10:47:17 PST
- by cinper on Wednesday, January 11 @ 18:20:19 PST
- by Erick on Sunday, January 15 @ 06:58:17 PST
- by Waidmann on Wednesday, January 11 @ 07:30:12 PST
- by jmarvin on Tuesday, January 10 @ 09:54:58 PST
- by JL on Wednesday, January 11 @ 09:03:26 PST
- by jmarvin on Thursday, January 12 @ 21:16:32 PST
- by BigD on Tuesday, January 10 @ 11:19:25 PST
- by leslie on Tuesday, January 10 @ 14:40:18 PST
- by BigD on Tuesday, January 10 @ 21:20:03 PST
- by leslie on Wednesday, January 11 @ 08:11:21 PST
- by BigD on Wednesday, January 11 @ 08:58:31 PST
|
|