 |
 |
|
God's reason for creating Adam was His desire to reproduce Himself...He was not a little like God. He was not almost like God. He was not subordinate to God even. -- Kenneth Copeland, "Following the Faith of Abraham," tape 01-3001, n.d. |
|
 |  |
Preterism: Need convincin'
Posted on Friday, August 26 @ 20:27:44 PDT by Virgil |
|
Tony from France writes: "I am not a preterist yet, where as I think you are all on the right track as regards the prophesies etc: The thing that disturbs me with both the 'left behinders'( Tim Haye etc:) and the 'right behinders (The preterists)is this....it's all too self centred, the 'left behinders' are concerned only with saving their skins at the end of the world and the 'right behinders' seem only concerned with their spiritual futures. Being a christian is about redemption of the whole man, body and soul and the planet that sustains him. Both sides of the behind seem to be advocating escaping from reality..."
.. I keep asking myself when reading articles and blogs on this site if anyone has anything to say about how all this theology is to be worked out in practise, what difference does it make to our lives or to our planet. Most of the contributers are American and it discourages me to think that christian men and women who live in the most feared and disliked nation in the world seem only concerned with their own spiritual existence and not with the absolute mess they are creating all over the globe. It time you all got your heads from out of your behinds and faced reality, weither or not you believe in the second coming,or the ressurection of the dead etc: there is an awful lot of Jesus's teaching that isn't being applied in our world, show me how preterism can be relevant to the needs of this planet and it's inhabitants and if you convince me ..I'll join up.
Subsequent replies exchanged on August 25. What is in italics is my (Virgil's) original message to Tony...the rest is his reply:
Hi Virgil,
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
I am going to go through your mail with a fine toothcomb.
First of all, I feel the need to level the ground a little between us and ask you to remember that we are not the same age, you are a young man who has more time to ask questions about life and its many possible meanings, I am a middle aged man and my time for asking questions is shorter and and more urgent and as an english minister, the late David Green said
" as I get older I believe more and more in less and less"
Tony,
Again, your reply is full of presuppositions that I don't necessarily
agree with. (You are displaying the classic Eropean arrogance that I
so much hate. I am also a foreigner living in a foreign land. I am a
Romanian living in the United States. I spent most of my life in
Europe (Romania, Germany and France), which is now literally a
spiritual wasteland, readily embracing Islam and everything else BUT
Christianity.
France is not really a foriegn land to me, no more than the next state along is to an American, there are differences between England and France, but very slight differences, it is run differently, I'll grant you, but then in America too, each state has a certain autonomy ( ie: death penalty, taxes etc).
If we take that verse in revelation that says ' I would rather you were cold than luke warm' then England would be lukewarm and France cold, England still claims to be a christian country ( though with little evidence to prove it ) whereas France most surely doesn't.
France has a long history of 'chucking' christians out, and hasn't had a revival in over 600 years... which was was led me to come and plant a church here 16 years ago. ( I was young and optimistic once)
Anyway, ' wilderness ' experiences seem to quite popular in the bible, Moses, the children of Isreal, John the Baptist and Jesus of course, and often it's an experience one has to go through before entering something better... so maybe there's hope for France.
We have countries like France a "Christian nation," ( not christian !)
which makes deals under the table with the Communists in China,
selling them weapons that will most likely end up killing Americans or
innocent people in Hong Kong, or in Singapore. We have unions in
France robbing their employers so they can get in their 30 days on the
beach every year, causing the economy to grow at what now...less than
1% per year, causing most of the country to live at the mercy of the
allmighty government instead of their own choices.
Oh come on, Virgil,
All western nations have people that make a living selling arms and their argument ( to help them sleep at night ) is that they don't actually do the the shooting !
Arms dealing is on the same level as prostitution and drugs dealing, it cares little who buys and less who gets hurt.
You are right though, that people in France live on less money than other western nations,
( but it's also true that all western nations live on too much and greedily gobble far more than their share of the worlds resources ) but on the other hand France has the best medical system in the world, sick children aren't left to die here because they haven't got medical insurance.
Look - if you want to talk social impact, we can talk social impact.
The United States of America sends more aid to the world than France,Germany and Britain combined, and that doesn't even include private donations from ministries, Churches and individuals.
There are nearly twice as many people in the U.S.A and I think that per head you will find that your figures are wrong, plus you shouldn't include aid sent to lands that the America has invaded, the oil for food scheme can't be seen as foreign aid as the Irakian people are paying for it.
When the United States speaks up about solving poverty in Africa, it is being
criticized as being too intrusive in other countries' affairs when we
all very well know that the cause of poverty in those countries is
their political system, and the thugs masquerading as "presidents."
When last did the wonderful nations of Europe do anything about those
countries? When did they attempt to do something about the thugs
running things in Zimbabwe, thugs who so far have killed thousands of
their own countrymen while stealing the aide given to them? If the
"doing" part of it lacks, then why isn't France or England taking the
helm and DOING something about Mugabe?
I will also give you the answer: they will not do anything about
Mugabe because they don't give a damn about the people suffering in
Europe. Europeans have found their groove now, trying to talk
terrorists out of doing terrorist things and talk Iran out of making
nukes. It is now catching up with them, so I am quite looking forward
to them enjoying the bitter fruits of their talking.
As Ghandi said and as recent history of events in Irak is again proving
'what country wouldn't prefer it's own bad government to an alien government imposed upon it"
I would have thourght that as a Romanian you would agree with Ghandi on this point.
Many of the African countries you speak about were once part of some european countrys empire, and the reason we don't just march in and overthrow dictators is that that would be
re installing foriegn rule on countries that have fought for their independance ( read again the quote from Ghandi) We are seeing the same thing in the former ' Eastern block' countries who are also suffering from thugs and gangsters taking advantage of the difficulties those countries are having adapting to Democracy... but very few would accept outside interference from the old mother Russia.
What American foriegn policy lacks is sensitivity, diplomacy and an intelligent understanding & respect for historical and cultural differences.( it is all heart and no head)
They have always had a clumsy and tactless foriegn policy.
America was built on violence, pushing out the native population with force, diplomacy was only ever used to fool the Indians and they never kept promises.... always shoot first & ask question later !
I think this way of sorting out differences has become well and truly engrained into the way American treat anyone who isn't white, who doesn't embrace democracy and doesn't speak english.I could add some quotes from Micheal Moore about the gun thing in America, but I suspect many Americans are sick of hearing bad press from him.
At last, ( do you mean alas ? I hope so !) this has little to do with Christianity. It has a lot to do with being decent human beings, with a decent understanding of
freedom, economics and politics. One doesn't have to be a Christian
or a Preterist to understand that all men have been created with
unalienable right, such as life, liberty and property. No other
country on earth recognizes these rights as the United States does.
The system may not be perfect, but it does a great job.
Virgil, your head is moving dangerously towards that dark place again.
It is precisely because of the teachings of Christ that we in the west, weither we call ourselves christian or not have any sense of decency and human rights, so it has a great deal to do with christianity.
It may be hard to define what a christian nation is and maybe we should just drop the term
altogether, but it is an undeniable fact that our laws regarding human rights are greatly influenced by the idea that all men are equal in the eyes of God and that we should love one another.
I won't say anything about 'loving your enemies' as I have a sneaky feeling that that verse has been blacked out by the C.I.A from all American bibles.
Let's take life, liberty and property as you have mentioned them.
a) In order to save life it should be everyones right to have free medical care if they can not afford health insurance.especially children.
b) Liberty... it's against the law to pray in school, what kind of liberty is that ?
c) Property...please take your next vacation in Philadelphia and see how people there respect property. Why should the havenots respect the property of the haves, how can one respect people having far more than their share when others have so little.
America, the home of the brave, the land of the free, who trust in God, If you believe that you will believe that France is all about ' liberty, fraternaty, equality ' too, these are great mottos but largely ignored, and anyone who still believes that these are widely adhered to, have their heads well inserted into that aforementioned lower region of their anatomy.
I would think
that as a Brit living in France you would be familiar with John
Locke's philosophy on natural law and Frederic Bastiat's essay titled
"The Law" - if you are not familiar with either author, I encourage
you do read both of them because it seems to me that the French
socialism is affecting your thinking...and this is not intended as an
offense.
I am a monachist, I would like Jesus to rule the planet and this is what mostly affects my thinking, but given that that won't happen for a while then, until that day comes I will be a socialist, I am for fair pay, equal opportunities, medical care for all who need it, government sponsored housing for the underpriviledged and free education, and for taxing the haves instead of the havenots to pay for all that.
Yet I am also for demanding that the french government make it easier for employers to employ, so I am not blind to the advantages of capitalism either.
Yes, I am familiar with John Locke but alas, not Frederic Bastiats essay.
And ultimately I take offense with you calling my president "stupid" -
stupid people don't become the leaders of the greatest countries on
this planet. He may not have his eschatology right and he may be in
some way pandering to the Christian right, but that's what politicians
do. If he was after votes from the Dispensationalists, he would not
have put pressure on Israel to close down illegal settlements in Gaza.
As you may know, this is taking place now, and it's a huge blow to
the dispensationalist whackos that do anything in their power to start
a war in the Middle East. So far George W. Bush is the only American
President who has shown a willingness to make positive changes in the
Middle East. Past presidents, like Reagan have totally missed the
boat in that regard mostly because of their view that Israel is the
chosen people of God and they can get away with murder. Bush doesn't
believe that...he has a positive mindset, as I do.
Nero was the leader of one of the greatest countries in the world, Hitler was also, Mussolini too, as well as good old, mad as a hatter, King George ( once ruler of what was then, the un-United States of America) There was also an english king who thourght that he could turn back the tide with a royal command and he got his feet wet.
Some of these leaders were very clever at politics, but stupid in as much as their worldview was madness.
Not all the leaders I just mentioned were voted into power (except Hitler and Mussolini)
some got there through family connections (inherited power)... a little like George Bush, in fact.
The last thing America wants is a war in the middle east as that would get in the way of them shipping out all that precious Irakian oil .( perhaps you are right, George may not be as stupid as I thought)
Actually, I agree with you, I don't think George Bush gives a fig about what the whacko right wing christians believe... so long as they vote for him.
I think that if one comes from the right social background, has the right connections and lots of money, then even a stupid man can become the leader of the most powerful nation in the world.
I hope you'll come around and not let the communists in France
influence your thinking in such a way that you are becoming one of
them.
and I hope you'll come around and not let the rebulicans in America
influence your thinking in such a way that you are becoming one of them.
God bless,
God bless you too.
Virgil Vaduva
PlanetPreterist.com
Tony Clay
Note: Updated with recent correspondence and exchanges
|
| |
 |
^^Go to Top - E-mail to Friend - Print - View PDF - Subscribe - Comments RSS
Re: Need convincin' (Score: 1)
by Virgil on Friday, August 26 @ 20:30:51 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | | I tried to explain to Tony that we are not necessarily about "convincing" anyone of anything. We are simply presenting our point of view for people out there to analyze. I got burned out on the confrontational and negative methods used by Preterist too often and I think in some ways he has a good point regarding us being more proactive in promoting the message. The problem is being careful with differentiating between a proactive message and a confrontational message that turns people away instantly. |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by frog on Saturday, August 27 @ 07:35:45 PDT
Re: Need convincin' (Score: 1)
by Islamaphobe on Friday, August 26 @ 21:22:14 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | This is an interesting little communication. Although Tony exhibits the standard French tendency to blame this country for "the absolute mess they are are creating all over the globe," he is at least seeking God. That, evidently, is something that a great many of his countrymen have given up doing. I wish him luck in his quest, but I think he needs to better grasp the point that a commitment to being a Christian involves getting things right with yourself before you attempt to reform the world.
After thinking a little about the world wars that Europe has gotten the rest of the world into, however, I have very little patience for being lectured from abroad. Where were the French in Ruanda? How many Christian missionaries are going from France and the other countries in Western Europe to Africa, Latin America, and Asia, and how many are going there from the United States? I don't know the answer to this question for sure, but I certainly have an opinion. I agree that Americans are too self-centered, but I also contend that non-Christians are generally more so than even dispensationalists. And I shudder when I think of the mess that has been created by non-Christians who have set out to remake the world. |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by frog on Saturday, August 27 @ 07:42:40 PDT
- by Ed on Saturday, August 27 @ 08:04:29 PDT
- by frog on Saturday, August 27 @ 09:09:10 PDT
- by Islamaphobe on Saturday, August 27 @ 14:36:25 PDT
- by rfwitt on Sunday, August 28 @ 04:14:56 PDT
- by frog on Sunday, August 28 @ 06:06:23 PDT
Re: Devolution of the Species (Score: 1)
by chrisliv on Friday, August 26 @ 23:30:58 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | Yeah, Franco,
I'm of the opinion that if one person can "convince" you of something, then someone else could probably come behind and convince you of the opposite.
You have a mind, and it looks like you are using it well.
As you know, when the 13 British Colonies won their independence from an Imperial central government after a violent revolution, they all entered into a compact for several years, known as The Articles of Confederation. But after about a decade the US Constitution was ratified, which created a new 14th government, known as The United States of America, which was given a 10 mile square tract of land as it exclusive legislative jurisdiction, besides the several limited functions to be performed as the new Constitution directed.
And besides the District of Columbia, federal territories, like St. Croix, and military bases on property actually ceded by a State to the United States, come under the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of the United States "federal gov." of America, i.e. The Bill of Rights doesn't actually apply in those places, which probably makes little difference, anyway.
We do see things like abuse and torture in places like Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib Prison, and it's because of racist and tyrannical mentalities of federal employees within their, mostly, Federal Zones. But, sometimes they did it in places like Waco, Texas, too, where tanks and psychological warfare were used to, ultimately, kill about 80 men, women, and children. And, that triggered at least one US Gulf War I veteran to retaliate by bombing the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, which was the tactical center for the Waco executions, which killed another 168 people and injuring 800.
So, we see that the Revolution that ended an Imperial British central government in America, was soon replaced by a new central government: the United State, headquartered in Wash DC.
But, as your own countryman, Alexis DeTocqueville noted in Democracy in America, before the Civil War Period, the Imperial nature of the United State had not yet developed very much amongst the libertarian Americans, except when it came to killing Indians or trafficking in the souls of blacks who were kidnapped from their homes.
Although, you, as a Frenchman should know how easy it is for US federal employees, after Imperial exploits against Mexico, Cuba, Haiti, Phillipines, Latin America, Korea, Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, etc., for Wah DC to become addicted to exercising that Imperial brutality, since Frenchmen have done the very same things in places like Latin America, Vietnam, Africa, and the somewhat recent brutality and tyranny exerted in Algeria during the 1950's. Yet, it was some of your countrymen, like that brilliant humanitarian and existentialist, Jean Paul Sarte, who condemned the actions of France's Imperial central government. Maybe you can tell us why a French atheist was the prominent voice at that time. Maybe atheists have a higher sense of morality than state-incorporated Christians do?
The "French" were just like the "Americans" a very short while ago. Of course, that doesn't excuse the mass murder of poor men, women, and children. And, if all French are now fully-evolved, well, God Bless You All. But, do not make the mistake that all Americans are Neanderthals or dupes of the United State.
Interestingly, US Citizens seem to punish themselves pretty well through their apparent idolatry, since as only 5% of the world population, they comprise 25% of all the imprisoned people on the planet today, and the ones outside those gates are punished with the many costs in taxes. These facts would certainly shock Alexis DeTocqueville today.
I'll agree with you that the difference between a statist Preterist and a statist Dispensationalist is virtually undectable when it comes to Christ-like conduct and speech. Most North American churchgoers seem to be terribly statist. And as m
Read the rest of this comment... |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by chrisliv on Saturday, August 27 @ 00:10:37 PDT
- by frog on Saturday, August 27 @ 07:51:52 PDT
- by chrisliv on Saturday, August 27 @ 10:15:33 PDT
- by frog on Saturday, August 27 @ 12:04:06 PDT
- by chrisliv on Saturday, August 27 @ 13:18:37 PDT
- by frog on Saturday, August 27 @ 16:32:29 PDT
- by chrisliv on Saturday, August 27 @ 18:43:57 PDT
- by frog on Sunday, August 28 @ 01:52:00 PDT
- by frog on Sunday, August 28 @ 06:14:10 PDT
- by chrisliv on Sunday, August 28 @ 09:09:59 PDT
- by frog on Sunday, August 28 @ 06:07:21 PDT
Re: Need convincin' (Score: 1)
by mitchg on Saturday, August 27 @ 07:00:17 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | Virgil -
Hope your head doesn't hurst too badly from banging your head against Tony's "wall".
I'll never understand the European mindset... America has pulled it's collective fat out of the fire time after time after time, and this is the respect it gets you. It parallels the larger Socialist mindset of the "have-nots" deserve more of what the "haves" have simply because they have more - isn't that called envy (or covetousness?).
Tony should remember that Scripture speaks again and again of generosity borne of a loving spirit, not extortion or cohersion.
Blessings...
Mitch G. |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by Virgil on Saturday, August 27 @ 07:49:34 PDT
- by frog on Saturday, August 27 @ 08:00:05 PDT
- by Ed on Sunday, August 28 @ 15:51:41 PDT
- by frog on Sunday, August 28 @ 17:43:18 PDT
Facing the future (Score: 1)
by judge on Saturday, August 27 @ 06:00:31 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | Hi and welcome to preterism.
I think that going forward preterism will be able to accomodate a wide variety of views.
You may like to check out my short article on this site here.
http://planetpreterist.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1638&PHPSESSID=70af965ca2bd1a3b0a5817f0a1b5ecdd
It begins...."Preterism is the only theological perspective which will enable us to successfully navigate the situation facing mankind at the moment. Any view of the world which sees either an imminent end of the world or even a delayed end of the world allows us to avoid squarely facing the fact that the world is not going to end.
By avoiding this we avoid facing and dealing with the real problems that face us at this particular point in history and are unique to theis period in history. These being the using up of the earths resources, the environmental ruin, populational problems and lastly the enourmous spiritual poverty resulting from our lack of self restraint." |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by judge on Saturday, August 27 @ 06:03:20 PDT
- by frog on Saturday, August 27 @ 08:02:22 PDT
- by judge on Sunday, August 28 @ 03:57:07 PDT
- by judge on Sunday, August 28 @ 04:13:49 PDT
- by frog on Sunday, August 28 @ 06:13:15 PDT
Socio-Communist Christianity (Score: 1)
by Virgil on Saturday, August 27 @ 07:25:45 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | Dear Tony,
Just as I suspected, you are either a communist or a socialist. This doesn't come as a surprise to me since I can sniff communist propaganda even when it is greatly dilluted with other stuff to make it more pallatable. What is even scarier, is that like many liberals and leftists, you actually believe the stuff you are saying. The many failures of the past will never teach you people that socialism simply doesn't work in practice.
Tony, your problem is not eschatological my friend...it's economical and political, and like someone said earlier in a comment here, I have little patience to be lectured by someone from Europe on the topic of politics or economics, even when Europe is my own homeland.
You want "free healthcare" for a society? I like talking "practically" here to avoid confusion. Why don't you take a look at my teeth and see how the "free" Romanian healthcare took care of them? Why don't you count the thousands of AIDS-infected children dying every year in "free" Romanian orphanages? How about the thousands of homeless children high on sniffing paint roaming the streets of Bucharest? Ahh...the wonderful fruits of Socialist utopia! And you are saying that MY head is stuck in my behind?
When I was praising Locke's philosophy, I did not say that it was fully implemented here in the United States. Let me deal with your three points you raised:
1. You said "In order to save life you need "free healthcare." I already showed how "free" healthcare actually destroys life, and does not save it. I don't need a PhD in Economics, and I am sure Mr. Evans here, a columnist on Planet Preterist can back what I am saying, but in an economic system, there is no such thing as "free" anything. Everything costs something at some stage in the economic process, so let's call "free healthcare" what it truly is: socialist healthcare, in other words, this can be truly summarized as taking money away from those who succeed in life and give it to those who do not. This can be the case for health expenses, food, or any other economic need. This is government-sanctioned theft at its highest, and France has mastered the system to the benefit of the politicians looking for votes from the labor force. This doesn't go to say that it is not happening in the United States, but God willing, I will live long enough to see the Fair Tax System implemented.
2. You said "It is against the law to pray in school, how can that be freedom?" You are right, but what you fail to realize is that those fighting prayer in government schools are friends of yours...socialists, communists and leftist liberals. But in itself, this is just another superficial issue we are discussing. The root problem is not banning prayer in government schools, but having schools run by the government to begin with! The government should stick to doing "government things" and leave education to the parents and those who are good at it. Private education and home-schooling is what this country is all about and government schools are just another manifestation of European socialist ideology. This is why my children are being homeschooled and will perhaps never set foot in a government classroom.
3. You mentioned that in Philadelphia property is not being respected. I don't know exactly what you are pointing out, but it is not your place, or my place to judge when one has enough property or more property than others. Throughout the Bible we see Abraham's rights to his property respected and enforced by God and we see the benefits coming from recognizing property rights. Isn't the need to own property and recognize that right what started the French Revolution? It is so absurd to me to hear someone saying that one owns "too much property" while others own "too little" that I have to cover my ears and walk away when I hear this. I cannot even imagine the arrogance required to someone to say "so and so owns too much." Does it ever occur to you t
Read the rest of this comment... |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by frog on Saturday, August 27 @ 08:28:49 PDT
- by Virgil on Saturday, August 27 @ 08:44:49 PDT
- by davo on Saturday, August 27 @ 08:57:19 PDT
- by Virgil on Saturday, August 27 @ 21:04:02 PDT
- by frog on Saturday, August 27 @ 09:54:08 PDT
- by Virgil on Saturday, August 27 @ 20:47:18 PDT
- by frog on Sunday, August 28 @ 02:10:30 PDT
- by frog on Sunday, August 28 @ 06:10:19 PDT
Re: Need convincin' (Score: 1)
by mc76 on Saturday, August 27 @ 09:27:23 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | | I'm still waitin for that oil. |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by frog on Saturday, August 27 @ 16:38:57 PDT
- by mc76 on Saturday, August 27 @ 18:38:34 PDT
- by frog on Sunday, August 28 @ 06:08:57 PDT
- by Ed on Sunday, August 28 @ 15:59:31 PDT
- by frog on Sunday, August 28 @ 18:28:08 PDT
- by Ed on Monday, August 29 @ 17:08:24 PDT
- by frog on Tuesday, August 30 @ 04:26:14 PDT
Re: Need convincin' (Score: 1)
by jaredcoleman (jaredcoleman@gmail.com) on Sunday, August 28 @ 15:38:21 PDT (User Info | Send a Message) | Virgil: "Look - if you want to talk social impact, we can talk social impact. The United States of America sends more aid to the world than France,Germany and Britain combined, and that doesn't even include private donations from ministries, Churches and individuals."
Tony: "There are nearly twice as many people in the U.S.A and I think that per head you will find that your figures are wrong, plus you shouldn't include aid sent to lands that the America has invaded, the oil for food scheme can't be seen as foreign aid as the Irakian people are paying for it."
Jared: I think that for this type of evaluation it is important to look not just at the raw numbers (which is what you were saying, Tony), but to express those numbers in terms of GDP (not simply the per capita figures). I believe that I heard somewhere that if you look at foreign aid as a percentage of GDP the US is toward the bottom of the list (your caveat about private donations figures not being included is duly noted, Virgil). I can't remember where I heard that information from, though. :) Maybe John Evans could help us here?
It's the difference between someone who makes $50,000 a year donating $10,000, and someone who makes $1,000,000 a year donating the same amount. I think that both Jesus and Paul spoke about the difference between giving out of abundance and giving sacrificially. |
[ To reply to this, please login or register ]
- by Virgil on Sunday, August 28 @ 19:56:55 PDT
- by jaredcoleman on Monday, August 29 @ 05:16:47 PDT
- by Islamaphobe on Monday, August 29 @ 14:40:30 PDT
- by jaredcoleman on Monday, August 29 @ 15:05:32 PDT
|
|