White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan on March 14 said, "If you're talking about peaceful civilian purposes, that's one matter. If you're talking about proliferation, that's another matter." When asked specifically about the CNNC's reported assistance to the nuclear weapons programs in Pakistan and Iran, McClellan said he would read the report and noted that the U.S. has "acted in certain instances when there have been companies in countries like China that have violated our export controls."

After he had seen the report, McClellan said the next day, "I just checked into it initially and my understanding is this is a preliminary proposal. It still has not been adopted."

On March 17, when asked whether Ex-Im would place a hold on the China deal, McClellan said: "The Export-Import Bank can probably talk to you about these issues. . . . I don't know all the specifics of this particular issue. I think you brought it up in the context of concerns about proliferation."

McClellan went on to say there are other government offices "that do look at the proliferation concerns. And before anything like that happens [the Ex-Im loans to China's nuclear power agency], they want to make sure that there is not a concern about proliferation. And so . . . they can talk to you about the preliminary plans they put forward in more detail."

Similarly, National Security Council spokesman Frederick Jones told HUMAN EVENTS to "contact the Ex-Im Bank" regarding the status of the loan guarantees.

So is President Bush for or against Ex-Im's proposed deal with China's nuclear power agency? Will he let it go forward? Or will he stop it? The answer is not clear.