You are hereSin Management 101

Sin Management 101


By Virgil - Posted on 27 February 2006

One day last week I went to eat lunch at this Greek place in Dayton, Ohio called The Gyro Palace, and when I walked in, I was greeted by a warm and friendly Egyptian owner, who told a cook born in Kuwait (but who is from Minnesota) to get me a salad with my gyro, after which a girl from Ohio sliced up some lamb meat for me and piled it up on some Greek pita bread. “You’ll need some cucumber sauce with that,” she said with a warm smile while she handed me a bottle of sauce. Oh, yes...I forgot to mention I am Romanian.After I sat down, I looked around the restaurant and saw a group of four Chinese men enjoying their lunch. A black couple was sitting a few tables over, and as the lunch crowd started to pour in, a group of Mexicans also walked in to wait in line. And the complexity of my lunch environment really started to seep into my head: all these people, from so many places, with so many feelings, fears, and needs coming to have lunch in a small Greek place owned by an Egyptian where a Kuwaiti cooks the food served by an all-American girl.

For the past week, I have been continuously thinking about all these people and about how well that seemingly innocuous lunch experience parallels the Christian faith. Yesterday I spoke at the Miami Valley Church about the cultural facets of our faith, and about how we often tend to put and American spin on Christianity. I pointed out how we are sometimes willing to “compromise” or justify ourselves regarding certain cultural aspects of the Scripture, such as women covering their heads in church, the drinking of grape juice rather than wine during the communion, and some men covering their heads while attending a church service.

Ironically we are often being lectured by professors of self-righteousness on what the Bible says. I know I am getting to the point of being sick and tired of hearing certain people say “the Bible says…” in their attempts to justify their self-righteousness, behavior and judgmental attitude. The bottom line is that the Bible “says” a lot of things; the problem is not with what the letters and words printed on the paper spell out; rather the problem is with what is being projected into the minds of those reading and interpreting those black markings we find on the white paper. The Bible says that it is O.K. to own slaves, that women should cover their heads in church, that first-century Christians drank wine for communion and that men shouldn’t cover their heads when praying.

Obviously, we are now starting to realize that there is a lot more to reading letters and words from the Bible. There are social and cultural aspects that need to be well thought-out. One example is the obvious anti-alcohol attitude that permeates American churches. Growing up in Europe gave me a totally different perspective on alcohol, especially regarding wine. I clearly remember being four or five years old and drinking a good-size glass of wine before going to bed. This was a cure for all things, be it colds, stomach aches and even a mild flu. It was even better after a good fried chicken leg soaked in a garlic sauce; and no, I did not grow up into some sort of alcoholic or abusive individual. Of course my ideas regarding alcohol were all challenged when I moved to the United States. I knew something was terribly wrong when I was told that the Baptist College I was attending strictly forbade any consumption of alcohol; not to mention the strange looks I got when I inquired where one could find a good red wine here in Ohio.

In this circumstance, sin seems to be culturally relative. More than once I have met a person who was more than ready and willing to damn to hell anyone who has even tasted wine. This brings to mind the comment made by someone during the conversation we had at the Miami Valley Church: “When I started going to church, I asked for a list of things that were denied so I knew what I had to give up in order to be a Christian.”

So what we observe is that when Christianity is presented as a counter-cultural religion, it becomes nothing more than an exercise in “sin management” or a religion where one has to always maintain a list of things that he can or cannot do in order to be in. But if that is the case, how then is our “religion” different than Islam or other religions where sin is also put under a microscope in order to be managed better?

May I suggest that perhaps our picture of Christianity is completely upside down? What if rather than perceiving Christianity as a religion, we look at it as a story? In eastern cultures, especially the Jewish culture, symbols are heavily being used to tell stories and communicate important messages. Is it possible that we are over-westernizing what was meant to be a simple and beautiful story? My story, your story, the beautiful story of God redeeming humanity from its mistakes; not robots, but real people with real needs, Romanians, Americans, Greeks, Egyptians, Kuwaitis, etc.

In Greek, the literal translation of the word sin (hamartia) is “miss” or “misses.” God seems to consider a sin one’s attempt to hit the target but missing. Interestingly enough, the natural use of the word in Greek varies from Homer’s use of hamartia, where he is using the example of a spear which misses its target, to Aristotle’s use of the word, indicating a “mistake.” That in itself tells me that because of the word used in the New Testament to describe sin, all people are trying to hit the target; unfortunately some miss it, and some hit closer to the target than others. So the point of our faith is not to become really good at sin management or at hitting the target, but to become more like God. And becoming more like God is not synonymous with exporting American Christianity to the rest of the world.

Thus being a Christian does in fact mean that we are each on a journey, living in the middle of the story of God changing us and transforming us into someone more like Him; being Christians is not something we do, but is something we are becoming more every day. Some of us think that is it a requirement to agree on all things before we can even speak with each other. But not long ago Alex said something here on Planet Preterist which I could hardly say better: “God allows perfectly honest and truth-seeking individuals to have differing opinions, in order to provide an environment in which it takes a true effort (self-sacrifice) to show love and mercy between them.”

Wow!

arabella5c's picture

Virgil, I totally agree. I have been thinking a lot about this very issue, particularly about how the church defines sin these days. I find this topic is particularly relevant when it comes to evangelism. It's almost like we need to find new language to communicate about "sin" and it's devastating consequences.

For example, try telling a homosexual that he or she is sinning by sleeping with someone of the same sex. That's not going to even scratch the surface of the issue. Perhaps the issue the church needs to focus on the deeper issue of the rejection of their own true gender, which is ultimately the rejection of themselves and probably points to rejection, unforgiveness, and unresolved bitterness involving their same-sex parent. The issue then becomes a heart attitude of self-rejection and self-hatred rather than the "act".

Jesus seemed to indicate that all sin was less about "behavior" than it was a heart attitude. Perhaps that's where the church has gone south - focusing too much on behavior and less on the heart.

Jessica W

Jessica

Virgil's picture

Jessica, I couldn't agree more. The homosexual issue is really probably the most important issue in the church today, and many Christian are blatantly displaying pure hatred for homosexuals and take backwards attitude of "change your life before you set foor in our church" rather than accepting people for who they are and helping them change their lives through love and compassion.

I have known several gays and have spent time around them and I can say that they were some of the most compassionate and kind people I have known. Now I never put a prerequisite on my association with them - I am sure in someone's book out there I am hell-bound, but I would rather worry about what God sees in my and their heart, rather than what other people believe about me.

chef's picture

VIRGIL,

You wrote

"...I clearly remember being four or five years old and drinking a good-size glass of wine before going to bed. This was a cure for all things, be it colds, stomach aches and even a mild flu. It was even better after a good fried chicken leg soaked in a garlic sauce; and no, I did not grow up into some sort of alcoholic or abusive individual..."

DUDE! I need that Romanian garlic sauce recipe!

I started my daughter off early too. WE have the rational Sabbath (Fri. night to Sat. night) in which we enjoyed a fine meal with wine or beer (not American beer though, YUK!). It's all Greek to me, literally :)

Yes the "church" needs to lighten up on many issues such as alcohol etiquette.

It seem too me that taboos create more problems for abuses than solved them.

Don't forget, I want that recipe bro! ;o)

Chef Tony

Chef Tony

psychohmike's picture

Awe come on. We should embrace our early American puritanical roots. Just think, if it wasn't for prohibition we wouldn't have characters like Al Capone to make documentaries about.

8) Mike

Virgil's picture

Tony..Greek food rules man..it's not far from Romanian food. And the recipe for that garlic sauce is really easy..what recipe? :)

- grill one or two fresh tomatoes well
- take a head of garlic, clean it up and mince it or mash it up in a wood bowl until it turns into a sort of paste
- add some kosher salt to taste
- add water to the consistency you would like
- add the tomatoes and mix them in

This is not for the faint of heart though...you'll either love it or hate it.

We should definitely exchange some more recipes sometimes...i love trying out new food...and your idea of a Sabbath is very cool. I have been thinking about doing the same thing too and take a break from everything for at least one day a week. Not an easy thing to do...I think we are all addicted to being busy.

Jer's picture
Virgil's picture

Not bad for $15 Jeremy...I may have to pick that up one day, but Jamie is still getting upset with me for only using the Mario Batali and Emeril books only a couple of times.

davo's picture

Virgil: My story, your story, the beautiful story of God redeeming humanity from its mistakes…

Ah Virgil, if only we truly believed what we say we affirm – what a contrast to 'Sin Management 101'. Christendom post Parousia has sort to reinvent the wheel, but the wheel keeps falling off.

The reason we have sin management 101 is that we have learned to be "sin conscious" – a total contrast from that out of which Christianity sprung.

Heb 9:7 But into the second part the high priest went alone once a year, not without blood, which he offered for himself and for the people’s sins committed in ignorance.

Heb 10:2-3 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? For the worshipers, once purified, would have had no more consciousness of sins. But in those sacrifices there is a reminder of sins every year.

What have we done in Christendom? – at least under the old regime [Ex 30:10] the blood of bulls and goats negated "sin consciousness" for at least for 12 months, until it needed repeating. Have we made the blood of Jesus so weak that it can't deliver for 12 seconds before "we" start trying once again to "manage sin"; why do we seek to reinvent the wheel – or the Cross?

Why have we in Christendom become so "sin conscious", why has it become our focus? – one reason, it gives us a sense of control. But Scripture tells us that there is only ONE mediator between God and man, and the truth is He did a once for ALL first rate permanent job, never to be repeated.

davo

psychohmike's picture

Hey Davo,
So if we could get over the sin-consiousnesss thing, would we then cease needed accountability groups? Or maybe we could move beyond them to something even more constructive.

Man...How do we get past the catholic guilt thing. I know that I'm slowly getting over it but it amazes me how much some people hold onto their guilt and self condemnation.

Time to throw off the old ball and chain!!!

Mike 8)

Virgil's picture

You guys both have good points. I don't know what to make of it all...i think there is a differences between feeling guilt and sin-consciousness. I think Christians need to get over the guilt thing and live as if they are on top of the world (which they are) rather than whining and moaning all the time. Now guilt does point us to sin, but it's an indicator of when we miss the target..that's all..it's not something that corrects our aim, nor should we focus on that.

In some ways, the catholics have the confession to fall back on, so it's a nice way to avoid dealing with these issues personally, but again, we all nede to let go.

psychohmike's picture

Missing the mark by definition would mean that I'm aiming for the target. So what if you're not even aiming for the target. Doh...

Now thats something to ponder...

8) MIke

davo's picture

G'day Mike,

Accountability is a good thing -- guilt and or manipulation however, less so. I think that a sense of accountability comes out of belonging, and belonging comes from acceptance. To the degree we perceive we are not accepted to that degree accountability means less to us. Churchianity has taught us that God's acceptance is limited to our ability [performance] to respond to Him; totally back to front. It's like we've given the sinner's prayer, or the lack thereof, more power than the Incarnation.

davo

cinper's picture

My Italian grandmother poured me my first glass of wine when I was 11 or 12, at the Sunday dinner table. There was never any alcohol anathema in my house, I did not grow up to abuse alcohol, and I did not carry this unfortunate anti-alcohol stance into my faith when I believed in Christ at age 18.

I find that the curious anti-alcohol attitude in some churches is simply indicative of a larger worldview by which these people can measure others against themselves, and always come out on top. They say they believe in salvation by grace, not works, yet they need to compare your sin against theirs so they can say, "Well, I may be a sinner but at least I'm not as bad as...."

It has not been so bad here in Southern Cal. I wish, however, I could start a Men's Fellowship where we could hold discussions over wine and cigars rather than the usual coffee and stale Danish. Haven't yet approached my pastor with this idea. Think it would fly?

Thanks for a great article.

Perry

psychohmike's picture

You know Perry...you and I are only about 15 minutes apart from eachother. We should get together sometime. You are more than welcome to a cigar...although I think I will pass. Have you ever tried a stale danish with a two dollar bottle of wine...Not bad. 8p

I do agree though. Burnt coffee and stale danishes should be relegated to something other than good conversation.

Mike 8)

JL's picture

Mike,

I need to get in on this to. Do you still have my number?

JL

Blessings,

JL Vaughn
Beyond Creation Science

psychohmike's picture

Yup. We will have to get something started.

8) Mike

Virgil's picture

Perry, why shouldn't we be able to approach a pastor with these issues? I spoke with Terry about the possibility of lighting candles at our own church services, not to be a mandatory thing, but to give people the possibility to light a candle, say a prayer and ponder on the symbolism of light that a burning candle offers. It may take quite a bit of effort for him to get over his evangelical aversion to candles, but I am willing to be patient. :)

cinper's picture

It seems that evangelicals have really thrown the baby out with the bathwater. Candles are a great example. I wish we had "kneelers" in our Protestant churches. Some have them, but most do not. I kind of resent that I am expected to stand or sit. Kneeling is my preferred position during worship and prayer, but the church design works against me.

Also, we have lost a whole generation to "rock and roll" worship. Where are the hymns? And the choirs? Another "American" cultural tradition that is now practically a sacrament in the American Evangelical Protestant Church. I haven't heard a church organ in ages. But I hear Top 20 Christian pop masquerading as worship, with too-loud drums, four guitars, an electronic keyboard, and a "back up group" that I can't hear harmonize over the din of the electronic instruments.

But we Protestants, we are Sola Scriptura, yessiree. Tradition - bah!

Perry

MiddleKnowledge's picture

Good article, Virgil.

The first time I ran across the concept of sin management 101 was in Dallas Willard's marvelous book, The Divine Conspiracy. If I remember right, he broke it down into two approaches. Sin management on the right and sin management on the left. It's a great book, though slightly futurist, if you haven't read it yet.

I agree especially with the strangeness of anti-alcohol Christianity. I grew up in the Bible belt (some call it Baptist belt) down in the Southeast US. Nothing was worse than beer/wine/spirits to multitudes there, except maybe tobacco.

But this is where there is a sense in which the true biblical gospel has become counter-cultural TO COMMON CHRISTIAN CULTURE. Do you see what I mean? You could add the same application to the pettiness/self-centeredness common in Christian culture. The gospel cuts against all that nonsense.

Other than that observation, I agree with your critique of a narrow "counter-cultural" gospel stance. You are right that the communication of Scripture is story/metaphor based. Which is why it is universal. Any culture that tries to exhaust the gospel for its own self-justification is doomed to obsolescence.

Thanks for your article. Very interesting,

Tim Martin
www.truthinliving.org

Virgil's picture

Tim, regarding your "counter-cultural" comment, I agree with you, but I guess my question was more "should Christianity always be counter-cultural?" If that is the case, then the following question is "counter who's culture?" American, Mexican, Japanese? It is clear that generally speaking Christianity has adopted a vast majority of cultural values throughout the ages, so why now the suddent concern with counter-culturalism? And what do we counter when we do in fact reach our goal of changing the world for Christ? :)

Perhaps we can learn from Paul and call out truth when we see it, the way he saw truth in the writings of the non-Christian Greek philosophers. I don't know..it's a tough issue to deal with because we are all, every single one of us, bound by cultural, social and theological paradigms, no matter how much we say we think freely and independently.

MiddleKnowledge's picture

Virgil,

It is a difficult issue. My approach is simply to live as robust a Christian life in my family, church, society context as is humanly possible (and I think the Spirit is the animator here). When I do that, I find that a lot of these details and nuances seem to take care of themselves.

The gospel culture is a riotous, dynamic, fun, energetic, on-the-edge-of-your-seat ride. It is the eternal life itself. And boy, does it get noticed (and sometimes hated).

Blessings to you Virgil,

Tim Martin

Flakinde's picture

Glad that bit inspired you, Virgil!

"Yesterday I spoke at the Miami Valley Church about the cultural facets of our faith, and about how we often tend to put and American spin on Christianity."

Hey, I think you're on to something with the whole multicultural thing, something I've thought about a whole lot myself, but never before related to how we define sin. It's so true that when we get into censorship mode (the word "don't" or the phrase "a Christian shouldn't" at a frequency of 3 per minute), it's all really based on what WE think is sin and what's not, but based on our own particular cultural background.

As you, I also have had to be very patient to understand this thing called "American Christianity", which I've come to know only since I've begun living in the U.S. 6 years ago, and I can't really say I understand it completely yet... not that I consider it special in any way, but as they say, "when in Rome . . .".

The reality is, I live here, and one way to show mercy to others is to respect their notions of what good and bad is. That doesn't mean I need to agree that what they say is sin, is such; but when dealing with someone from a different culture, one person needs to take the first step in opening up in hopes of making a connection, much like Christ took the first sacrificial step in order to embrace us. If I need to hold off on that glass of wine until you and I can begin talking... yeah, I can do that.

Multicultural, global Christianity . . . good topic for your next podcast . . . ;)

Blessed in His rest,

Alexander Rodríguez

Virgil's picture

Alex, I have also adopted the "when in Rome" approach, however I am getting more and more tired of it, especially when it is becoming more evident that it is a facade. Ironically, the very things evangelicals created to separate themselves from catholics and orthodox churches are themselves becoming obstacles to their own faith.

Perhaps you can participate on the next podcast and we could cover some interesting ground with our various cultural perspectives. Let's do it :)

Flakinde's picture

Virgil,

I've never thought about it as a facade, but you very well might be right. As we move forward unifying the Body in Love, delusions of cultural supremacy could probably be our largest obstacle, as long as we think about the Church as a global deal, and as long as we quit slapping the ties with brothers and sisters in other countries with the cold "mission efforts" label.

Let me know when you want to talk about the podcast, k?

Alexander Rodríguez

Recent comments

Poll

Should we allow Anonymous users to comment on Planet Preterist articles?
Yes absolutely
24%
No only registered users should comment
76%
What are you talking about?
0%
Total votes: 41